Multimodal Connectome Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth: Distinct Patterns of Concurrent Severity and Prospective Symptom Change

Disruptive behaviors problems, such as irritability/anger and maladaptive aggression, are associated with altered connectivity across networks supporting emotion regulation. However, multimodal connectome markers of concurrent severity and prospective symptom change, including sex-specific patterns, remain unclear. Using a large, sex-balanced sample from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we applied multimodal connectome-based predictive modelling (CPM) to test whether resting-state functional (n = 7,556; 49.3% female) and structural (N = 8,978; 48.4%) connectivity predicted baseline disruptive behavior severity (at ages 9-10) and 2-year symptom change (from ages 9-10 to 11-12). Models were adjusted for covariates, permutation-tested, and FDR corrected. Secondary analyses tested sex-stratified models separately in males and females. In models emerging as significant, follow-up analyses tested for distinct vs shared predictive edges. Functional and structural connectomes predicted baseline severity (ρ = 0.087 and ρ = 0.071, respectively). Functional connectivity also predicted prospective symptom change (ρ = 0.038), whereas prospective structural prediction was predominately with negative edges (ρ = 0.026). Functional connectivity models were significant in both sexes, while prospective structural connectivity models were significant in males, but not females. Frontoparietal, medial frontal, sensorimotor, salience, cerebellar, and visual networks contributed across models. Cross-sectional models showed a more distributed pattern while prospective models showed a more focal pattern. These findings identify complementary, largely distinct functional and structural connectome patterns associated with current disruptive behavior risk and subsequent symptom change, supporting the importance of developmental timing, sex, and imaging modality in developing brain-based biomarkers of disruptive behavior risk in youth.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.26.761676
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Multimodal Connectome Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth: Distinct Patterns of Concurrent Severity and Prospective Symptom Change

Karim Ibrahim, Denis G. Sukhodolsky, Dustin Scheinost, Qinghao Liang et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
preprint

Multimodal Connectome Markers of Disruptive Behavior Problems in Youth: Distinct Patterns of Concurrent Severity and Prospective Symptom Change

Karim Ibrahim, Denis G. Sukhodolsky, Dustin Scheinost, Qinghao Liang, Raimundo X. Rodriguez, Yize Zhao, Eleni Christofilea, Kaiting Mai, Caroline Lloyd
preprint en

Abstract

Disruptive behaviors problems, such as irritability/anger and maladaptive aggression, are associated with altered connectivity across networks supporting emotion regulation. However, multimodal connectome markers of concurrent severity and prospective symptom change, including sex-specific patterns, remain unclear. Using a large, sex-balanced sample from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study, we applied multimodal connectome-based predictive modelling (CPM) to test whether resting-state functional (n = 7,556; 49.3% female) and structural (N = 8,978; 48.4%) connectivity predicted baseline disruptive behavior severity (at ages 9-10) and 2-year symptom change (from ages 9-10 to 11-12). Models were adjusted for covariates, permutation-tested, and FDR corrected. Secondary analyses tested sex-stratified models separately in males and females. In models emerging as significant, follow-up analyses tested for distinct vs shared predictive edges. Functional and structural connectomes predicted baseline severity (ρ = 0.087 and ρ = 0.071, respectively). Functional connectivity also predicted prospective symptom change (ρ = 0.038), whereas prospective structural prediction was predominately with negative edges (ρ = 0.026). Functional connectivity models were significant in both sexes, while prospective structural connectivity models were significant in males, but not females. Frontoparietal, medial frontal, sensorimotor, salience, cerebellar, and visual networks contributed across models. Cross-sectional models showed a more distributed pattern while prospective models showed a more focal pattern. These findings identify complementary, largely distinct functional and structural connectome patterns associated with current disruptive behavior risk and subsequent symptom change, supporting the importance of developmental timing, sex, and imaging modality in developing brain-based biomarkers of disruptive behavior risk in youth.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Yale University (US)
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon