Image-, 3D- and Sensor-Based Defect and Anomaly Detection in Manufacturing Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Review

Factories need to nd defects early, and learning-based inspection isspreading fast. This review asks how well it works and how well the evidenceis reported. We read 46 primary studies and 17 context papers publishedfrom late 2023 to 2026. The primary studies split into 23 individual modelsand 23 hybrid designs. Individual detectors beat their own starting model byabout two to seven points, but only on one dataset at a time. Hybrid designshelp when each part xes a different weakness. In four ablations a single partlowered the score, and in two tables a subset beat the full model. A fewbenchmarks dominate: NEU-DET appears in 10 studies and GC10-DET in 7.Only 13 of 46 studies report spread over repeated runs, and only two timetheir model on an edge board. We nd three gaps: single-dataset testing,missing deployment cost, and weak reporting of variance. The review islimited to open-access papers from a three-year window. We propose crossdatasettests, hardware-stamped timing and repeated-run reporting.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23841322
Primary Topic
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Image-, 3D- and Sensor-Based Defect and Anomaly Detection in Manufacturing Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Review

Saksham Tayal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
article

Image-, 3D- and Sensor-Based Defect and Anomaly Detection in Manufacturing Using Machine Learning and Deep Learning: A Review

Saksham Tayal
article en

Abstract

Factories need to nd defects early, and learning-based inspection isspreading fast. This review asks how well it works and how well the evidenceis reported. We read 46 primary studies and 17 context papers publishedfrom late 2023 to 2026. The primary studies split into 23 individual modelsand 23 hybrid designs. Individual detectors beat their own starting model byabout two to seven points, but only on one dataset at a time. Hybrid designshelp when each part xes a different weakness. In four ablations a single partlowered the score, and in two tables a subset beat the full model. A fewbenchmarks dominate: NEU-DET appears in 10 studies and GC10-DET in 7.Only 13 of 46 studies report spread over repeated runs, and only two timetheir model on an edge board. We nd three gaps: single-dataset testing,missing deployment cost, and weak reporting of variance. The review islimited to open-access papers from a three-year window. We propose crossdatasettests, hardware-stamped timing and repeated-run reporting.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon