Reconsidering the Conceptual Scope of Mindfulness: Integrating Islamic Mindfulness into Contemporary Psychological Science

This commentary extends Van Dam et al.'s (2018) critique of the conceptual and methodological limitations of mindfulness research. While their analysis highlights definitional ambiguity and methodological inconsistencies, this commentary argues that this ambiguity is also partly shaped by the selective incorporation of specific contemplative traditions within psychological science. In particular, the limited engagement with non-Western religious frameworks, including Islamic traditions, restricts the conceptual scope of mindfulness. Drawing on existing theoretical and empirical literature, this commentary introduces Islamic mindfulness as a structured and culturally embedded framework in which attentional processes are integrated with ethical orientation and spiritual practice. It argues that such a framework may clarify conceptual distinctions, support more contextually grounded measurement approaches, and enhance ecological validity through practice-based and behaviorally embedded forms of mindfulness. In addition, the commentary reconsiders empirical findings by emphasizing how cultural context shapes the effectiveness and interpretation of mindfulness practices. Rather than proposing a replacement for existing models, the analysis extends them by situating mindfulness within a broader epistemological and cultural perspective. This approach aligns with ongoing efforts to refine definitions, improve methodological rigor, and promote greater inclusivity in the scientific study of mindfulness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lentera Jurnal
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64271/04sbs686
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconsidering the Conceptual Scope of Mindfulness: Integrating Islamic Mindfulness into Contemporary Psychological Science

Aamer Aldbyani
Lentera Jurnal
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Reconsidering the Conceptual Scope of Mindfulness: Integrating Islamic Mindfulness into Contemporary Psychological Science

Aamer Aldbyani
article en

Abstract

This commentary extends Van Dam et al.'s (2018) critique of the conceptual and methodological limitations of mindfulness research. While their analysis highlights definitional ambiguity and methodological inconsistencies, this commentary argues that this ambiguity is also partly shaped by the selective incorporation of specific contemplative traditions within psychological science. In particular, the limited engagement with non-Western religious frameworks, including Islamic traditions, restricts the conceptual scope of mindfulness. Drawing on existing theoretical and empirical literature, this commentary introduces Islamic mindfulness as a structured and culturally embedded framework in which attentional processes are integrated with ethical orientation and spiritual practice. It argues that such a framework may clarify conceptual distinctions, support more contextually grounded measurement approaches, and enhance ecological validity through practice-based and behaviorally embedded forms of mindfulness. In addition, the commentary reconsiders empirical findings by emphasizing how cultural context shapes the effectiveness and interpretation of mindfulness practices. Rather than proposing a replacement for existing models, the analysis extends them by situating mindfulness within a broader epistemological and cultural perspective. This approach aligns with ongoing efforts to refine definitions, improve methodological rigor, and promote greater inclusivity in the scientific study of mindfulness.

Lentera JurnalVol. 2(2)
Thamar University (YE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon