When technologies transform: a consideration of open innovation's contributions to operations management

Purpose This paper examines what an open innovation (OI) perspective contributes to operations and supply chain management when a technology transition reshapes an industry. Earlier operations management research implicitly defined OI as a small set of isolated practices. This paper recovers its fuller depth as bidirectional knowledge flows and a mindset anchored in the business model. Design/methodology/approach The study traces innovation in the global automotive industry across three phases, then develops illustrative case studies of four Chinese electric vehicle (EV) entrants, Kandi, BYD, Xiaomi and Chery, analyzed through outside-in flows, inside-out flows and business model innovation. The cases build on a structured review of Chinese-language academic and industry literature, corroborated against company reports, trade press and industry data. Findings Chinese EVs have attained industry leadership, yet no dominant EV innovation strategy has emerged. All four firms drew heavily, but differently, on external knowledge, much of it from consumer electronics and smartphones, outside the automotive supply chain and each treated the vehicle as a platform. BYD and Chery also pursued inside-out flows, BYD through divisionalization and an open vehicle architecture, Chery through technology exports and internal suppliers. The contribution runs both ways: OI extends operations management research from project-and dyad-level openness to firm-level strategy, while operations management research helps explain organizational configuration and governance in innovation. Research limitations/implications The findings rest on a single industry. Future work should test them in other transforming sectors: pharmaceuticals, financial services and defense. Originality/value The paper reframes OI for operations management scholarship and uses the Chinese EV phenomenon to show how it complements operations management when industry architectures are disrupted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-06-2026-0939
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When technologies transform: a consideration of open innovation's contributions to operations management

Yixuan Shi, Henry W. Chesbrough
International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

When technologies transform: a consideration of open innovation's contributions to operations management

Yixuan Shi, Henry W. Chesbrough
article en

Abstract

Purpose This paper examines what an open innovation (OI) perspective contributes to operations and supply chain management when a technology transition reshapes an industry. Earlier operations management research implicitly defined OI as a small set of isolated practices. This paper recovers its fuller depth as bidirectional knowledge flows and a mindset anchored in the business model. Design/methodology/approach The study traces innovation in the global automotive industry across three phases, then develops illustrative case studies of four Chinese electric vehicle (EV) entrants, Kandi, BYD, Xiaomi and Chery, analyzed through outside-in flows, inside-out flows and business model innovation. The cases build on a structured review of Chinese-language academic and industry literature, corroborated against company reports, trade press and industry data. Findings Chinese EVs have attained industry leadership, yet no dominant EV innovation strategy has emerged. All four firms drew heavily, but differently, on external knowledge, much of it from consumer electronics and smartphones, outside the automotive supply chain and each treated the vehicle as a platform. BYD and Chery also pursued inside-out flows, BYD through divisionalization and an open vehicle architecture, Chery through technology exports and internal suppliers. The contribution runs both ways: OI extends operations management research from project-and dyad-level openness to firm-level strategy, while operations management research helps explain organizational configuration and governance in innovation. Research limitations/implications The findings rest on a single industry. Future work should test them in other transforming sectors: pharmaceuticals, financial services and defense. Originality/value The paper reframes OI for operations management scholarship and uses the Chinese EV phenomenon to show how it complements operations management when industry architectures are disrupted.

International Journal of Operations & Production Management
Aston University (GB), Libera Università Internazionale degli Studi Sociali Guido Carli (IT), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon