Communicating Colonial Space: How Imperial Discourse Produced “Surplus Land” in the Kazakh Steppe

This article examines how Russian-language press debate and official statistical reporting produced, disputed, and operationalized “surplus land” in the Kazakh Steppe and adjoining Turkestan territories. It analyzes 43 items reproduced in the Turkestanskii sbornik : 37 newspaper and publicistic texts and six Resettlement Administration studies published between 1885 and 1915. Rather than treating the archive as a unified imperial voice, it distinguishes advocacy, regional criticism, and official calculation. Claims made availability plausible; counterclaims exposed instability; statistical practices converted disputed assumptions into surveys, pastoral norms, tables, maps, and calculable surpluses. A comparison with Port Phillip in 1835 distinguishes Crown authorization of possession from the calculation of pastoral requirements. Communicative legibility is a general process of making representations actionable across genres. Its colonial configuration here joined imperial authority, the subordination of Indigenous territorial claims, and settler allocation, rather than constituting a mechanism exclusive to colonial governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Communication Inquiry
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01968599261504748
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Communicating Colonial Space: How Imperial Discourse Produced “Surplus Land” in the Kazakh Steppe

Myrzantay Zhakyp
Journal of Communication Inquiry
Soviet and Russian History
article

Communicating Colonial Space: How Imperial Discourse Produced “Surplus Land” in the Kazakh Steppe

Myrzantay Zhakyp
article en

Abstract

This article examines how Russian-language press debate and official statistical reporting produced, disputed, and operationalized “surplus land” in the Kazakh Steppe and adjoining Turkestan territories. It analyzes 43 items reproduced in the Turkestanskii sbornik : 37 newspaper and publicistic texts and six Resettlement Administration studies published between 1885 and 1915. Rather than treating the archive as a unified imperial voice, it distinguishes advocacy, regional criticism, and official calculation. Claims made availability plausible; counterclaims exposed instability; statistical practices converted disputed assumptions into surveys, pastoral norms, tables, maps, and calculable surpluses. A comparison with Port Phillip in 1835 distinguishes Crown authorization of possession from the calculation of pastoral requirements. Communicative legibility is a general process of making representations actionable across genres. Its colonial configuration here joined imperial authority, the subordination of Indigenous territorial claims, and settler allocation, rather than constituting a mechanism exclusive to colonial governance.

Journal of Communication Inquiry
Manash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University (KZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon