Procedural Safeguards for the Protection of Children’s Rights in Civil Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Uzbekistan and Foreign Jurisdictions

Formal access to a court does not by itself ensure effective protection of children’s rights. Children depend on adults to initiate and conduct proceedings, while the adults involved may have interests that differ from the child’s interests. This article examines procedural safeguards for children in civil and family proceedings, focusing on access to justice, participation, representation, the assessment of best interests, privacy and implementation of judicial decisions. It applies doctrinal and comparative legal methods to international standards, the law of Uzbekistan, selected European Court of Human Rights judgments, and legislation in England and Wales, Germany, France, Russia and Kazakhstan. The analysis distinguishes three concepts that are often conflated: hearing a child, giving appropriate weight to the child’s views, and obtaining the child’s consent where the law requires it. It identifies a gap between the broad guarantees in Uzbekistan’s Family Code and the detailed procedures needed to operationalise them.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Property and Human Rights
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/a7yaaw55
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedural Safeguards for the Protection of Children’s Rights in Civil Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Uzbekistan and Foreign Jurisdictions

Nazokat Abdukakharovna Gapparova
Journal of Intellectual Property and Human Rights
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Procedural Safeguards for the Protection of Children’s Rights in Civil Proceedings: A Comparative Legal Analysis of Uzbekistan and Foreign Jurisdictions

Nazokat Abdukakharovna Gapparova
article en

Abstract

Formal access to a court does not by itself ensure effective protection of children’s rights. Children depend on adults to initiate and conduct proceedings, while the adults involved may have interests that differ from the child’s interests. This article examines procedural safeguards for children in civil and family proceedings, focusing on access to justice, participation, representation, the assessment of best interests, privacy and implementation of judicial decisions. It applies doctrinal and comparative legal methods to international standards, the law of Uzbekistan, selected European Court of Human Rights judgments, and legislation in England and Wales, Germany, France, Russia and Kazakhstan. The analysis distinguishes three concepts that are often conflated: hearing a child, giving appropriate weight to the child’s views, and obtaining the child’s consent where the law requires it. It identifies a gap between the broad guarantees in Uzbekistan’s Family Code and the detailed procedures needed to operationalise them.

Journal of Intellectual Property and Human Rights
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon