Conformal Prediction for River Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Prediction and Risk Quantification

Probabilistic machine learning models estimate total dissolved solids (TDS) levels and exceedance probabilities, enabling risk-based regulation and safeguarding public health. This study develops a probabilistic machine learning framework to forecast monthly TDS in the Lam Tsuen River in Hong Kong using long‑term monitoring data from 2000 to 2023, split into 80% for training and 20% for testing. Four routinely measured variables, pH, salinity, turbidity, and water temperature, were used as predictors of TDS. Five gradient boosting‑based algorithms (Gradient boosting, LightGB, XGBoost, CatBoost, and GPBoost) were calibrated, and predictive uncertainty was quantified using three conformal prediction schemes: Split Conformal Prediction (SplitCP), Cross Validation Plus (CV+), and Conformal Quantile Regression (CQR). Probabilistic prediction was implemented via the Treeffuser framework, enabling consistent construction of prediction intervals and exceedance probabilities. Among the tested models, GPBoost delivered the best deterministic performance, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and correlation coefficient (CC) of 85.968 mg/l, 59.943, and 0.902 on the test set, respectively, outperforming gradient boosting (RMSE 88.855 mg/l, MAE 61.067, CC 0.906), LightGB (RMSE 89.837, MAE 62.054, CC 0.905), XGBoost (RMSE 97.723, MAE 68.792, CC 0.885), and CatBoost (RMSE 108.758 mg/l, MAE 66.886, CC 0.840). The conformal prediction methods produced well‑calibrated prediction intervals, with the narrowest and most stable bands obtained for GPBoost. SHAP analysis further showed that salinity and turbidity were the dominant predictors, followed by pH and water temperature, providing hydrochemically consistent insight into the drivers of TDS variability. These methods can be extended to river quality/quantity for probabilistic forecasting and adaptive planning.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Khazar Journal of Water and Environment
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.68277/kjwe.2026.11
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Conformal Prediction for River Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Prediction and Risk Quantification

Erfan Abdi, Ali Torabi Haghighi, Mahesh Pal
Khazar Journal of Water and Environment
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Conformal Prediction for River Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) Prediction and Risk Quantification

Erfan Abdi, Ali Torabi Haghighi, Mahesh Pal
article en

Abstract

Probabilistic machine learning models estimate total dissolved solids (TDS) levels and exceedance probabilities, enabling risk-based regulation and safeguarding public health. This study develops a probabilistic machine learning framework to forecast monthly TDS in the Lam Tsuen River in Hong Kong using long‑term monitoring data from 2000 to 2023, split into 80% for training and 20% for testing. Four routinely measured variables, pH, salinity, turbidity, and water temperature, were used as predictors of TDS. Five gradient boosting‑based algorithms (Gradient boosting, LightGB, XGBoost, CatBoost, and GPBoost) were calibrated, and predictive uncertainty was quantified using three conformal prediction schemes: Split Conformal Prediction (SplitCP), Cross Validation Plus (CV+), and Conformal Quantile Regression (CQR). Probabilistic prediction was implemented via the Treeffuser framework, enabling consistent construction of prediction intervals and exceedance probabilities. Among the tested models, GPBoost delivered the best deterministic performance, with Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Error (MAE), and correlation coefficient (CC) of 85.968 mg/l, 59.943, and 0.902 on the test set, respectively, outperforming gradient boosting (RMSE 88.855 mg/l, MAE 61.067, CC 0.906), LightGB (RMSE 89.837, MAE 62.054, CC 0.905), XGBoost (RMSE 97.723, MAE 68.792, CC 0.885), and CatBoost (RMSE 108.758 mg/l, MAE 66.886, CC 0.840). The conformal prediction methods produced well‑calibrated prediction intervals, with the narrowest and most stable bands obtained for GPBoost. SHAP analysis further showed that salinity and turbidity were the dominant predictors, followed by pH and water temperature, providing hydrochemically consistent insight into the drivers of TDS variability. These methods can be extended to river quality/quantity for probabilistic forecasting and adaptive planning.

Khazar Journal of Water and EnvironmentVol. 1(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon