Hysteretic Dynamics of Stream Network Expansion and Contraction Revealed Through High‐Resolution Integrated Hydrological Modeling

Abstract As landscapes cycle through wetting and drying, stream networks expand and contract, driving material export and biogeochemical transformations with important implications for water quality and ecosystem function. Because it is challenging to measure the extent of the active network, streamflow () is often used as a proxy. However, the relationship remains uncertain, especially for larger catchments where direct observation is labor intensive. Using a process‐based integrated hydrological model capable of resolving inundation patterns at high spatial and temporal resolution, we study the dynamics of network extent for a 75 km 2 watershed and its subcatchments. Without catchment‐specific calibration, simulations using the ATS integrated hydrology model agree well with observed daily stream discharge and observed stream persistency regime (perennial vs. non‐perennial). Simulation results reveal that a unique, synchronous relationship between and exists only for small catchments. Specifically, the synchronous data exhibit substantial scatter due to hysteresis, which increases with increasing catchment size. However, a robust relationship free of hysteresis emerges when asynchronous event‐scale peaks of and are considered instead. The event‐scale asynchronous relationship is well approximated as power‐law over the range of peak simulated and remains consistent across nested catchments of varying size, independent of antecedent wetness, season, and storm details. In baseflow conditions, the scaling is also well approximated with a power law but with a larger exponent, suggesting different runoff generation mechanisms. These results offer a more robust framework for understanding stream expansion and contraction in larger, more complex basins.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water Resources Research
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025wr042993
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hysteretic Dynamics of Stream Network Expansion and Contraction Revealed Through High‐Resolution Integrated Hydrological Modeling

Scott L Painter, Elizabeth M. Herndon, Saubhagya Singh Rathore, J. D. Gomez‐Velez
Water Resources Research
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Hysteretic Dynamics of Stream Network Expansion and Contraction Revealed Through High‐Resolution Integrated Hydrological Modeling

Scott L Painter, Elizabeth M. Herndon, Saubhagya Singh Rathore, J. D. Gomez‐Velez
article en

Abstract

Abstract As landscapes cycle through wetting and drying, stream networks expand and contract, driving material export and biogeochemical transformations with important implications for water quality and ecosystem function. Because it is challenging to measure the extent of the active network, streamflow () is often used as a proxy. However, the relationship remains uncertain, especially for larger catchments where direct observation is labor intensive. Using a process‐based integrated hydrological model capable of resolving inundation patterns at high spatial and temporal resolution, we study the dynamics of network extent for a 75 km 2 watershed and its subcatchments. Without catchment‐specific calibration, simulations using the ATS integrated hydrology model agree well with observed daily stream discharge and observed stream persistency regime (perennial vs. non‐perennial). Simulation results reveal that a unique, synchronous relationship between and exists only for small catchments. Specifically, the synchronous data exhibit substantial scatter due to hysteresis, which increases with increasing catchment size. However, a robust relationship free of hysteresis emerges when asynchronous event‐scale peaks of and are considered instead. The event‐scale asynchronous relationship is well approximated as power‐law over the range of peak simulated and remains consistent across nested catchments of varying size, independent of antecedent wetness, season, and storm details. In baseflow conditions, the scaling is also well approximated with a power law but with a larger exponent, suggesting different runoff generation mechanisms. These results offer a more robust framework for understanding stream expansion and contraction in larger, more complex basins.

Water Resources ResearchVol. 62(11)
University of Iowa (US), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon