ThreatFusion AI: AI-Powered Cyber Threat Intelligence Fusion Platform Using Graph Memory and MITRE ATT&CK

Analyst burnout in security operations centers is not mainly a volume problem. It is a structure problem. Logs from endpoints, cloud services, and network devices sit in one tool, while the threat intelligence that would make sense of those logs sits in five or six others. An analyst chasing a suspicious IP typically opens Virus Total, OTX, and a few OSINT feeds manually before getting an answer, and that workflow breaks quickly when the queue has twenty open cases. ThreatFusion AI addresses this at the architecture level. We built a temporal knowledge graph that holds internal telemetry, open-source threat feeds, and MITRE ATT&CK technique mappings in one queryable structure. A team of specialized LLM agents works against that graph to check whether an indicator or behavior pattern has appeared before and which campaign it might belong to. Before any automated containment step executes, a dedicated guardrail agent validates it against policy rules. Low-risk steps go through SOAR automatically; anything higher-impact waits for a human analyst. This paper describes the six-layer architecture, the reasoning behind each design decision, and the evaluation methodology we are running against simulated attack traffic.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Integrated Engineering Sciences
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63686/jies.v2i4040
Primary Topic
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

ThreatFusion AI: AI-Powered Cyber Threat Intelligence Fusion Platform Using Graph Memory and MITRE ATT&CK

Vedant Sayare, Mukul Suryawanshi, Anshul Vairagade, Abhishek Pathak et al.
Journal of Integrated Engineering Sciences
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
article

ThreatFusion AI: AI-Powered Cyber Threat Intelligence Fusion Platform Using Graph Memory and MITRE ATT&CK

Vedant Sayare, Mukul Suryawanshi, Anshul Vairagade, Abhishek Pathak, Tanush Bamnote, Jay gurav
article en

Abstract

Analyst burnout in security operations centers is not mainly a volume problem. It is a structure problem. Logs from endpoints, cloud services, and network devices sit in one tool, while the threat intelligence that would make sense of those logs sits in five or six others. An analyst chasing a suspicious IP typically opens Virus Total, OTX, and a few OSINT feeds manually before getting an answer, and that workflow breaks quickly when the queue has twenty open cases. ThreatFusion AI addresses this at the architecture level. We built a temporal knowledge graph that holds internal telemetry, open-source threat feeds, and MITRE ATT&CK technique mappings in one queryable structure. A team of specialized LLM agents works against that graph to check whether an indicator or behavior pattern has appeared before and which campaign it might belong to. Before any automated containment step executes, a dedicated guardrail agent validates it against policy rules. Low-risk steps go through SOAR automatically; anything higher-impact waits for a human analyst. This paper describes the six-layer architecture, the reasoning behind each design decision, and the evaluation methodology we are running against simulated attack traffic.

Journal of Integrated Engineering SciencesVol. 2(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Network Security and Intrusion Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon