Assessment Of Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Among Students Using the NOVA Food Classification System

Abstract Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are industrial formulations generally manufactured from refined food substances, food derivatives and additives, with little or no intact whole food. Their consumption may be particularly common among students because of convenience, affordability, aggressive marketing, and easy availability. This study was designed to assess the level of UPF consumption among university students using the NOVA food classification system. A descriptive cross-sectional approach was proposed for 120 students aged 18–25 years. Dietary intake was assessed using a structured questionnaire and repeated 24-hour dietary recalls. Reported foods and beverages were assigned to the four NOVA groups, and the contribution of Group 4 foods to total daily energy intake was calculated. For descriptive interpretation in this study, students were categorized as low (<30%), moderate (30–50%) or high (>50%) consumers. The illustrative analysis showed that UPFs supplied 52.4% of total daily energy. Of the students, 23.3% were in the low, 35.0% in the moderate and 41.7% in the high consumption category. Packaged snacks, biscuits, instant noodles, bakery products, sugar-sweetened beverages and ready-to-eat foods were common sources. The findings indicate the potential importance of nutrition education, food-label literacy and healthier campus food environments. Because the present numbers are illustrative, conclusions must be updated after analysis of actual participant-level data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23830443
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment Of Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Among Students Using the NOVA Food Classification System

Akash Kushwah
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

Assessment Of Ultra-Processed Food Consumption Among Students Using the NOVA Food Classification System

Akash Kushwah
article en

Abstract

Abstract Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are industrial formulations generally manufactured from refined food substances, food derivatives and additives, with little or no intact whole food. Their consumption may be particularly common among students because of convenience, affordability, aggressive marketing, and easy availability. This study was designed to assess the level of UPF consumption among university students using the NOVA food classification system. A descriptive cross-sectional approach was proposed for 120 students aged 18–25 years. Dietary intake was assessed using a structured questionnaire and repeated 24-hour dietary recalls. Reported foods and beverages were assigned to the four NOVA groups, and the contribution of Group 4 foods to total daily energy intake was calculated. For descriptive interpretation in this study, students were categorized as low (<30%), moderate (30–50%) or high (>50%) consumers. The illustrative analysis showed that UPFs supplied 52.4% of total daily energy. Of the students, 23.3% were in the low, 35.0% in the moderate and 41.7% in the high consumption category. Packaged snacks, biscuits, instant noodles, bakery products, sugar-sweetened beverages and ready-to-eat foods were common sources. The findings indicate the potential importance of nutrition education, food-label literacy and healthier campus food environments. Because the present numbers are illustrative, conclusions must be updated after analysis of actual participant-level data.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon