Liquidity-Saving Mechanisms for 24/7 Instant Payment Systems: Rolling Liquidity Bounds, Certified Offsetting, and an Open Benchmark

Liquidity-saving mechanisms (LSMs) let interbank payment systems settle with less intraday cash by queueing payments and settling offsetting sets together. Most analyses assume the system closes each day; instant-payment systems such as FedNow never close and promise settlement within seconds. This preprint gives the first analytical bounds for that setting: a liquidity floor that no settlement engine can beat when every payment must settle within a delay cap T; conditions under which the floor is attained, and a two-bank counterexample where it is not; rolling liquidity bounds for systems with no end of day; and a proof that settling a batch at once, netted, never needs more liquidity than any ordering of it. In simulations calibrated to published Fedwire and FedNow statistics, a one-minute cap leaves at most 0.55% of liquidity for any engine to save. The upload includes the paper, a standalone proofs note, and all code, data and tests (102 brute-force checks).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23841233
Primary Topic
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Liquidity-Saving Mechanisms for 24/7 Instant Payment Systems: Rolling Liquidity Bounds, Certified Offsetting, and an Open Benchmark

Ethan Li
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
preprint

Liquidity-Saving Mechanisms for 24/7 Instant Payment Systems: Rolling Liquidity Bounds, Certified Offsetting, and an Open Benchmark

Ethan Li
preprint en

Abstract

Liquidity-saving mechanisms (LSMs) let interbank payment systems settle with less intraday cash by queueing payments and settling offsetting sets together. Most analyses assume the system closes each day; instant-payment systems such as FedNow never close and promise settlement within seconds. This preprint gives the first analytical bounds for that setting: a liquidity floor that no settlement engine can beat when every payment must settle within a delay cap T; conditions under which the floor is attained, and a two-bank counterexample where it is not; rolling liquidity bounds for systems with no end of day; and a proof that settling a batch at once, netted, never needs more liquidity than any ordering of it. In simulations calibrated to published Fedwire and FedNow statistics, a one-minute cap leaves at most 0.55% of liquidity for any engine to save. The upload includes the paper, a standalone proofs note, and all code, data and tests (102 brute-force checks).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Banking stability, regulation, efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Liquidity-Saving Mechanisms for 24/7 Instant Payment Systems: Rolling Liquidity Bounds, Certified Offsetting, and an Open Benchmark — Ethan Li · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS