Development and validation of a non-invasive multimodal risk score incorporating clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, and fibrosis indices for prediction of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: A cross-sectional analytical study

Background and Aim: Esophageal varices are a major complication of cirrhosis; non-invasive risk stratification could help identify patients at higher risk. Many existing scores require liver stiffness or other specialized testing. This study aimed to develop and internally validate COVUS-F, a multimodal score using only routinely available clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, and fibrosis parameters. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 140 participants: 40 healthy controls and 100 cirrhotic patients (60 with esophageal varices, 40 without). All underwent clinical assessment, laboratory testing, ultrasonography, and endoscopy. Logistic regression and ROC analysis developed the COVUS-F score, internally validated with 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Results: Platelet count, portal-vein diameter, APRI, and Child-Pugh classification formed the COVUS-F score (0–7), with an AUC of 0.903. At a cut-off of ≥5, sensitivity was 70.0%, specificity 85.0% (bootstrap-validated AUC 0.857, 95% CI: 0.781–0.920). High-risk varices occurred in 10.3%, 31.8%, and 61.2% of the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively. Conclusions: COVUS-F showed good, internally validated performance but should not be used as a stand-alone rule-out strategy given its 25.0% missed-high-risk-varices rate. It may serve as a preliminary risk-prioritization tool pending external validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.2026.19651
Primary Topic
Liver Disease and Transplantation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a non-invasive multimodal risk score incorporating clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, and fibrosis indices for prediction of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: A cross-sectional analytical study

Sayed Ahmed Sayed, Samir A. Afifi, Mohammad AbdElhameed Alwaseef, Abdulmabod Omar et al.
Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica
Liver Disease and Transplantation
article

Development and validation of a non-invasive multimodal risk score incorporating clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, and fibrosis indices for prediction of esophageal varices in cirrhosis: A cross-sectional analytical study

Sayed Ahmed Sayed, Samir A. Afifi, Mohammad AbdElhameed Alwaseef, Abdulmabod Omar, Hossam Aladl Aladl Aladl, Awatif Edrees, Ahmed T Elganzory, Salma Abdelghany Shawkat, Fatma Saffeyeldin Mohamed, E. S. I. Mohamed, Amr A Abdelkader, Ahmed Ali Elshebiny, Mohamed Azzam Abd Elrahman Ali El-Seaidy, Ahmed Omran Desouky Mohamed, Osama Mostafa Abd Elrazik
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: Esophageal varices are a major complication of cirrhosis; non-invasive risk stratification could help identify patients at higher risk. Many existing scores require liver stiffness or other specialized testing. This study aimed to develop and internally validate COVUS-F, a multimodal score using only routinely available clinical, laboratory, ultrasonographic, and fibrosis parameters. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 140 participants: 40 healthy controls and 100 cirrhotic patients (60 with esophageal varices, 40 without). All underwent clinical assessment, laboratory testing, ultrasonography, and endoscopy. Logistic regression and ROC analysis developed the COVUS-F score, internally validated with 1,000 bootstrap resamples. Results: Platelet count, portal-vein diameter, APRI, and Child-Pugh classification formed the COVUS-F score (0–7), with an AUC of 0.903. At a cut-off of ≥5, sensitivity was 70.0%, specificity 85.0% (bootstrap-validated AUC 0.857, 95% CI: 0.781–0.920). High-risk varices occurred in 10.3%, 31.8%, and 61.2% of the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk categories, respectively. Conclusions: COVUS-F showed good, internally validated performance but should not be used as a stand-alone rule-out strategy given its 25.0% missed-high-risk-varices rate. It may serve as a preliminary risk-prioritization tool pending external validation.

Acta bio-medica dell'Ateneo parmense/Acta biomedica
Ain Shams University (EG), Taif University (SA), Al-Azhar University (EG), Zagazig University (EG), Tanta University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Liver Disease and Transplantation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon