Revolutionary transformation of digital art:ontological reconstruction and paradigm shift driven by technology

Abstract This study examines changes in digital art’s creative mechanisms, subject relations, and conditions of existence through the lens of the philosophy of technology. Tracing the evolution from mechanical and electronic media to algorithmic systems, the paper argues that technology no longer functions merely as an external tool but increasingly intervenes in artistic cognition, creative processes, and the conditions under which works are generated. The paper outlines three notable dimensions of change in digital art: technologically mediated existence, distributed creative relations, and algorithmically shaped aesthetic processes. The paper also examines three tensions: Western aesthetic dominance via biased training data, NFT-driven value paradoxes, and destabilized artistic subjectivity under generative AI. Drawing on process philosophy, complexity theory, and technological phenomenology, it proposes a techno-cognitive framework positioning digital art as a dynamic interface between technology and human cognition. The study proposes evaluative and ethical discussion frameworks better suited to contemporary digital art, with the aim of supporting further theoretical analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-09574-x
Primary Topic
Art, Technology, and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revolutionary transformation of digital art:ontological reconstruction and paradigm shift driven by technology

Chao Luo, Jie Chen, Yiwei Mo, Qin Yu et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Art, Technology, and Culture
article

Revolutionary transformation of digital art:ontological reconstruction and paradigm shift driven by technology

Chao Luo, Jie Chen, Yiwei Mo, Qin Yu, Qi Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines changes in digital art’s creative mechanisms, subject relations, and conditions of existence through the lens of the philosophy of technology. Tracing the evolution from mechanical and electronic media to algorithmic systems, the paper argues that technology no longer functions merely as an external tool but increasingly intervenes in artistic cognition, creative processes, and the conditions under which works are generated. The paper outlines three notable dimensions of change in digital art: technologically mediated existence, distributed creative relations, and algorithmically shaped aesthetic processes. The paper also examines three tensions: Western aesthetic dominance via biased training data, NFT-driven value paradoxes, and destabilized artistic subjectivity under generative AI. Drawing on process philosophy, complexity theory, and technological phenomenology, it proposes a techno-cognitive framework positioning digital art as a dynamic interface between technology and human cognition. The study proposes evaluative and ethical discussion frameworks better suited to contemporary digital art, with the aim of supporting further theoretical analysis.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Hubei Institute of Fine Arts (CN), The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Art, Technology, and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Revolutionary transformation of digital art:ontological reconstruction and paradigm shift driven by technology — Chao Luo, Jie Chen, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS