Global clinical development of transcranial temporal interference stimulation: an analysis of registered human trials

Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a noninvasive approach intended to engage deep or distributed brain targets. Despite a growing number of human studies, the global landscape, design characteristics, and reporting practices of registered tTIS trials remain unclear. We characterized the global clinical development of tTIS by examining registration trends, trial design, intervention reporting, and result availability. We searched nine international and regional clinical trial registries through April 30, 2026, to identify human interventional trials involving tTIS or related transcranial interferential stimulation approaches. Eligible records were deduplicated and coded for geography, indication, intended target, enrollment, design, stimulation parameters, device or platform information, safety reporting, and result availability. From 1,548 records, 168 unique trials were included. Registrations increased markedly after 2023 and were concentrated in China (79.8%) and the United States (11.3%). Psychiatric disorders were the leading indication group (39.8%), and target information was not reported in 75 trials (​4​4​.​6%). Among reported targets, subcortical structures predominated. Most trials involved a single center (94.6%), and 51.8% planned to enroll fewer than 50 participants. Randomization, masking, and sham control were reported in 69.6%, 74.4%, and 66.7% of trials, respectively. Among stimulation parameters, session duration was reported most frequently (40.5%). Device or platform information was reported in 12.5% of trials. At the data cutoff, 13 trials (7.7%) were classified as completed or terminated. Results were available for 8 trials (4.8%) from 10 sources. Registered tTIS research is expanding rapidly across diverse indications and intended targets, while clinical development remains at an early stage and intervention reporting remains incomplete. Greater transparency and consistency in trial registration and intervention documentation will enhance comparability across trials, facilitate protocol replication and evidence synthesis, and support the development of a more coherent evidence base for tTIS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medicine
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-026-05363-0
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global clinical development of transcranial temporal interference stimulation: an analysis of registered human trials

Cong Fu, Liqun Jiao, Yan Ma, 张晓华 et al.
BMC Medicine
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Global clinical development of transcranial temporal interference stimulation: an analysis of registered human trials

Cong Fu, Liqun Jiao, Yan Ma, 张晓华, Rui Liu, Lei Cao, Jiaqi Jin, Shihao Jiang, Linlin Ye, Xuesong Bai, Fuchao Yu, Zexing Li, Tao Wang, Tianyu Wang
article en

Abstract

Transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) is a noninvasive approach intended to engage deep or distributed brain targets. Despite a growing number of human studies, the global landscape, design characteristics, and reporting practices of registered tTIS trials remain unclear. We characterized the global clinical development of tTIS by examining registration trends, trial design, intervention reporting, and result availability. We searched nine international and regional clinical trial registries through April 30, 2026, to identify human interventional trials involving tTIS or related transcranial interferential stimulation approaches. Eligible records were deduplicated and coded for geography, indication, intended target, enrollment, design, stimulation parameters, device or platform information, safety reporting, and result availability. From 1,548 records, 168 unique trials were included. Registrations increased markedly after 2023 and were concentrated in China (79.8%) and the United States (11.3%). Psychiatric disorders were the leading indication group (39.8%), and target information was not reported in 75 trials (​4​4​.​6%). Among reported targets, subcortical structures predominated. Most trials involved a single center (94.6%), and 51.8% planned to enroll fewer than 50 participants. Randomization, masking, and sham control were reported in 69.6%, 74.4%, and 66.7% of trials, respectively. Among stimulation parameters, session duration was reported most frequently (40.5%). Device or platform information was reported in 12.5% of trials. At the data cutoff, 13 trials (7.7%) were classified as completed or terminated. Results were available for 8 trials (4.8%) from 10 sources. Registered tTIS research is expanding rapidly across diverse indications and intended targets, while clinical development remains at an early stage and intervention reporting remains incomplete. Greater transparency and consistency in trial registration and intervention documentation will enhance comparability across trials, facilitate protocol replication and evidence synthesis, and support the development of a more coherent evidence base for tTIS.

BMC Medicine
Capital Medical University (CN), Xuan Wu Hospital of the Capital Medical University (CN), Liaocheng People's Hospital (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon