Enhancing groundwater level forecasting using LSTM: integrating hydrogeological variability for improved accuracy (case study: Dez Plain, Iran)

The performance of data driven models for groundwater level forecasting varies widely across hydrogeological settings. Conventional practice often responds with increasingly complex model architectures, while overlooking the inherent predictability of the underlying system. This study challenges that approach and argues that hydrogeological stability, largely shaped by anthropogenic pressure, is the primary control on forecast accuracy. Fixed structure Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models were applied to groundwater level data from five observation wells in Iran’s Dez Plain, representing conditions from hydrologically stable to highly unstable. System stability was quantified using three complementary indices—Maximum Annual Fluctuation (MaxAF), Average Annual Fluctuation (AvgAF), and the Average September–October Difference (ASODA)—which describe both the magnitude and persistence of groundwater level variability. Results from 100 bootstrap iterations show that in stabilized conditions, LSTM achieved low absolute error (RMSE ≈ 0.25 m), whereas the static SVR failed to reproduce observed dynamics (NSE < 0). In contrast, under pumping dominated and highly unstable conditions, LSTM produced high NSE (NSE > 0.90) but with large absolute errors (RMSE ≈ 0.60 m). This discrepancy reveals a “Variance Paradox,” where strong normalized performance metrics mask limited practical accuracy in high variance systems. We identify a physical “Predictability Barrier,” expressed as a monotonic increase in forecast error with hydrogeological instability. The findings support a shift from model optimization toward system diagnosis. A tiered management framework is proposed, guided by qualitative interpretation of forecast uncertainty: narrow Confidence Intervals (CIs) indicate stable, predictable systems (Tier 1), while broad CIs signal unstable conditions requiring physical restoration (Tier 2).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Water Science
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-026-03007-5
Primary Topic
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing groundwater level forecasting using LSTM: integrating hydrogeological variability for improved accuracy (case study: Dez Plain, Iran)

Farshad Ahmadi, Heidar Zarei, Armin Rashno, Mohammad Sadeghi
Applied Water Science
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
article

Enhancing groundwater level forecasting using LSTM: integrating hydrogeological variability for improved accuracy (case study: Dez Plain, Iran)

Farshad Ahmadi, Heidar Zarei, Armin Rashno, Mohammad Sadeghi
article en

Abstract

The performance of data driven models for groundwater level forecasting varies widely across hydrogeological settings. Conventional practice often responds with increasingly complex model architectures, while overlooking the inherent predictability of the underlying system. This study challenges that approach and argues that hydrogeological stability, largely shaped by anthropogenic pressure, is the primary control on forecast accuracy. Fixed structure Long Short Term Memory (LSTM) and Support Vector Regression (SVR) models were applied to groundwater level data from five observation wells in Iran’s Dez Plain, representing conditions from hydrologically stable to highly unstable. System stability was quantified using three complementary indices—Maximum Annual Fluctuation (MaxAF), Average Annual Fluctuation (AvgAF), and the Average September–October Difference (ASODA)—which describe both the magnitude and persistence of groundwater level variability. Results from 100 bootstrap iterations show that in stabilized conditions, LSTM achieved low absolute error (RMSE ≈ 0.25 m), whereas the static SVR failed to reproduce observed dynamics (NSE < 0). In contrast, under pumping dominated and highly unstable conditions, LSTM produced high NSE (NSE > 0.90) but with large absolute errors (RMSE ≈ 0.60 m). This discrepancy reveals a “Variance Paradox,” where strong normalized performance metrics mask limited practical accuracy in high variance systems. We identify a physical “Predictability Barrier,” expressed as a monotonic increase in forecast error with hydrogeological instability. The findings support a shift from model optimization toward system diagnosis. A tiered management framework is proposed, guided by qualitative interpretation of forecast uncertainty: narrow Confidence Intervals (CIs) indicate stable, predictable systems (Tier 1), while broad CIs signal unstable conditions requiring physical restoration (Tier 2).

Applied Water Science
Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz (IR), Lorestan University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Hydrological Forecasting Using AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon