Constitutional Context Management (CCM)

Contemporary AI systems rely on context windows as ephemeral substrates for reasoning. These windows are finite, mutable, and opaque, leading to silent drift in meaning, loss of invariants, and unobservable degradation of system behavior. While Governed Context & Memory (GCM) establishes persistence, provenance, and hash-bound memory, it does not govern what is active at any given moment. This paper introduces Constitutional Context Management (CCM), a framework for governing working state. CCM transforms context from a transient token buffer into a typed, hash-bound, admissible set of active commitments. It defines context artifacts, context lanes, and relevance as a governed admission function. It introduces context hashing for drift detection, amendment semantics for controlled evolution, and refusal as a first-class response to context insufficiency. We formalize a separation: GCM governs persistence across time CCM governs activation in the present Together, they produce continuity without drift. We argue that reliable reasoning, long-horizon interaction, and safe agent execution require governance not only of memory, but of attention itself.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23847507
Primary Topic
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constitutional Context Management (CCM)

Adam Ableman
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
article

Constitutional Context Management (CCM)

Adam Ableman
article en

Abstract

Contemporary AI systems rely on context windows as ephemeral substrates for reasoning. These windows are finite, mutable, and opaque, leading to silent drift in meaning, loss of invariants, and unobservable degradation of system behavior. While Governed Context & Memory (GCM) establishes persistence, provenance, and hash-bound memory, it does not govern what is active at any given moment. This paper introduces Constitutional Context Management (CCM), a framework for governing working state. CCM transforms context from a transient token buffer into a typed, hash-bound, admissible set of active commitments. It defines context artifacts, context lanes, and relevance as a governed admission function. It introduces context hashing for drift detection, amendment semantics for controlled evolution, and refusal as a first-class response to context insufficiency. We formalize a separation: GCM governs persistence across time CCM governs activation in the present Together, they produce continuity without drift. We argue that reliable reasoning, long-horizon interaction, and safe agent execution require governance not only of memory, but of attention itself.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon