From Tsarist Rule to Independence: The Transformation of Ethnic Identities in Kyrgyzstan

This article argues that state intervention was one of the primary forces reshaping ethnic and socio-economic differentiation in Kyrgyzstan from late imperial rule to the post-Soviet period. It combines historical census and archival material with field research conducted between 2008 and 2023 and an analysis of approximately 9,000 online posts. The cases of Kyrgyz, Russians, Uzbeks, Dungans, and Koreans show that borders, census categories, deportations, education, language policy, occupational structures, and post-Soviet nation-building repeatedly altered not only the status of ethnic groups but also the social environments in which cultural practices were reproduced. Soviet power did not manufacture culture at the press of a single button, yet decades of cumulative interventions transformed it profoundly. At the same time, inherited livelihoods, kinship practices, settlement patterns, and local memories limited the reach of social engineering. Kyrgyzstan therefore demonstrates both the extraordinary capacity of the state to construct and reorder national categories and the equally important persistence of historically rooted cultural difference.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kulturní studia
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7160/ks.2026-02(27).02
Primary Topic
Soviet and Russian History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Tsarist Rule to Independence: The Transformation of Ethnic Identities in Kyrgyzstan

Petr Kokaisl
Kulturní studia
Soviet and Russian History
article

From Tsarist Rule to Independence: The Transformation of Ethnic Identities in Kyrgyzstan

Petr Kokaisl
article en

Abstract

This article argues that state intervention was one of the primary forces reshaping ethnic and socio-economic differentiation in Kyrgyzstan from late imperial rule to the post-Soviet period. It combines historical census and archival material with field research conducted between 2008 and 2023 and an analysis of approximately 9,000 online posts. The cases of Kyrgyz, Russians, Uzbeks, Dungans, and Koreans show that borders, census categories, deportations, education, language policy, occupational structures, and post-Soviet nation-building repeatedly altered not only the status of ethnic groups but also the social environments in which cultural practices were reproduced. Soviet power did not manufacture culture at the press of a single button, yet decades of cumulative interventions transformed it profoundly. At the same time, inherited livelihoods, kinship practices, settlement patterns, and local memories limited the reach of social engineering. Kyrgyzstan therefore demonstrates both the extraordinary capacity of the state to construct and reorder national categories and the equally important persistence of historically rooted cultural difference.

Kulturní studiaVol. 2026(2)
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Soviet and Russian History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon