Surface EMG Characterization of the Jefferson Curl at a Submaximal Load Matched to the Romanian Deadlift: A Cross-Sectional Study in Resistance-Trained Adults

Background The Jefferson curl, a loaded spinal flexion exercise, has gained popularity in strength and rehabilitation practice but lacks empirical characterization. Whether it elicits different posterior-chain activation than the Romanian deadlift (RDL), a well-documented hip-hinge exercise, at a matched submaximal load is unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: To characterize erector spinae activation during the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load and test the hypothesis that, at the same absolute load, the Jefferson curl elicits greater erector spinae activation than the RDL; and to describe gluteus maximus and biceps femoris activation without a directional hypothesis. Study Design Cross-sectional observational study. Methods Twenty-one resistance-trained adults performed five repetitions of the Jefferson curl and of the RDL on a 30-cm platform. Load was adjusted to a Borg RPE of 16 during the Jefferson curl, and the same absolute load was used for the RDL. Surface EMG was recorded from the upper, middle, and lower erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris bilaterally and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC). Left and right values were averaged. A linear mixed-effects model with exercise*muscle fixed effects and participant as a random intercept was used. Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controlled the false discovery rate. Results The Jefferson curl elicited higher mean activation than the RDL in the upper erector spinae (62.84 vs 44.52 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.003, Hedges’ g=0.83), lower erector spinae (60.07 vs 47.85 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.49), and biceps femoris (54.18 vs 41.54 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.60). The middle erector spinae and gluteus maximus activation did not differ significantly (adjusted p≥0.45). Conclusion In resistance-trained adults, the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load produced greater upper- and lower-erector spinae and biceps femoris activation than the RDL at the same absolute load. The Jefferson curl can be considered when designing targeted recruitment of the erector spinae and hamstrings through controlled spinal flexion. Level of Evidence 3.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26603/001c.172559
Primary Topic
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Surface EMG Characterization of the Jefferson Curl at a Submaximal Load Matched to the Romanian Deadlift: A Cross-Sectional Study in Resistance-Trained Adults

Raz Margi, Tomer Yona, Arielle G. Fischer, Itai Har-Nir et al.
International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
article

Surface EMG Characterization of the Jefferson Curl at a Submaximal Load Matched to the Romanian Deadlift: A Cross-Sectional Study in Resistance-Trained Adults

Raz Margi, Tomer Yona, Arielle G. Fischer, Itai Har-Nir, Bar Kalifa, Segev Gildar
article en

Abstract

Background The Jefferson curl, a loaded spinal flexion exercise, has gained popularity in strength and rehabilitation practice but lacks empirical characterization. Whether it elicits different posterior-chain activation than the Romanian deadlift (RDL), a well-documented hip-hinge exercise, at a matched submaximal load is unknown. Hypothesis/Purpose: To characterize erector spinae activation during the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load and test the hypothesis that, at the same absolute load, the Jefferson curl elicits greater erector spinae activation than the RDL; and to describe gluteus maximus and biceps femoris activation without a directional hypothesis. Study Design Cross-sectional observational study. Methods Twenty-one resistance-trained adults performed five repetitions of the Jefferson curl and of the RDL on a 30-cm platform. Load was adjusted to a Borg RPE of 16 during the Jefferson curl, and the same absolute load was used for the RDL. Surface EMG was recorded from the upper, middle, and lower erector spinae, gluteus maximus, and biceps femoris bilaterally and normalized to maximal voluntary isometric contraction (%MVIC). Left and right values were averaged. A linear mixed-effects model with exercise*muscle fixed effects and participant as a random intercept was used. Benjamini-Hochberg procedure controlled the false discovery rate. Results The Jefferson curl elicited higher mean activation than the RDL in the upper erector spinae (62.84 vs 44.52 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.003, Hedges’ g=0.83), lower erector spinae (60.07 vs 47.85 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.49), and biceps femoris (54.18 vs 41.54 %MVIC, adjusted p=0.035, g=0.60). The middle erector spinae and gluteus maximus activation did not differ significantly (adjusted p≥0.45). Conclusion In resistance-trained adults, the Jefferson curl at a submaximal load produced greater upper- and lower-erector spinae and biceps femoris activation than the RDL at the same absolute load. The Jefferson curl can be considered when designing targeted recruitment of the erector spinae and hamstrings through controlled spinal flexion. Level of Evidence 3.

International Journal of Sports Physical TherapyVol. 21(11)
Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Maastricht University (NL), Palacký University Olomouc (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Muscle activation and electromyography studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon