From Source-Bound Proofs to Reproducible Research Artifacts: An NSRW Case Study

How can a research repository connect a mathematical construction to an inspectable, reproducible result? This case study examines the Navier–Stokes Research Workbench through its investigation of mass and angular histories, culminating in a same-point mass-zero/angular-positive theorem. It explains exact source binding, fresh external-module compilation, binary failure preservation and fixed-checkpoint replay, using concrete invocation, elaboration and archive-loss incidents. Version 0.6 adds a bounded exact-rational numerical experiment: rigorously rounded exponential and expm1 enclosures for normalized core scalars at 128, 256 and 512 fractional bits. The historical Lean replay, focused software checks and new numerical outputs retain distinct identities. The local full suite reports 645 passed, 3 skipped and 90.53% coverage; this is software validation, not independent mathematical reproduction. No explicit source Profile or numerical mass-zero/J certificate is claimed. Yun Kwansub. Version 0.6, 31 October 2026. Paper/source CC BY 4.0; supporting software MIT. Software archive: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23381778. Companion mathematical paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23835054. Repository: https://github.com/flamehaven01/NavierStokes-Research-Workbench.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23835111
Primary Topic
Scientific Computing and Data Management
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

From Source-Bound Proofs to Reproducible Research Artifacts: An NSRW Case Study

Kwansub Yun
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management
preprint

From Source-Bound Proofs to Reproducible Research Artifacts: An NSRW Case Study

Kwansub Yun
preprint en

Abstract

How can a research repository connect a mathematical construction to an inspectable, reproducible result? This case study examines the Navier–Stokes Research Workbench through its investigation of mass and angular histories, culminating in a same-point mass-zero/angular-positive theorem. It explains exact source binding, fresh external-module compilation, binary failure preservation and fixed-checkpoint replay, using concrete invocation, elaboration and archive-loss incidents. Version 0.6 adds a bounded exact-rational numerical experiment: rigorously rounded exponential and expm1 enclosures for normalized core scalars at 128, 256 and 512 fractional bits. The historical Lean replay, focused software checks and new numerical outputs retain distinct identities. The local full suite reports 645 passed, 3 skipped and 90.53% coverage; this is software validation, not independent mathematical reproduction. No explicit source Profile or numerical mass-zero/J certificate is claimed. Yun Kwansub. Version 0.6, 31 October 2026. Paper/source CC BY 4.0; supporting software MIT. Software archive: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23381778. Companion mathematical paper: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23835054. Repository: https://github.com/flamehaven01/NavierStokes-Research-Workbench.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Scientific Computing and Data Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon