Asset- and Time-Aware Evidence-to-Control Mapping and Contradiction Detection for OT Cybersecurity Assessment

This paper proposes an asset- and time-aware methodology for evidence-to-control mapping and contradiction detection in Operational Technology (OT) cybersecurity assessment. The proposed methodology focuses on structured evidence-to-objective mapping, asset and temporal context analysis, contradiction classification, and provenance-constrained assessment generation. The study proposes a comparative evaluation of three approaches: non-structured Large Language Model (LLM) assessment, conventional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and a structured, provenance-aware framework. The research uses NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3 as its primary OT security reference. A benchmark design of 60 base scenarios and five evidence conditions per scenario is proposed. Research status: This is a methodology-focused proposed-framework preprint. Dataset construction, independent annotation, implementation validation, and quantitative experimental evaluation remain pending. No empirical performance improvements or statistical findings are claimed.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23831530
Primary Topic
Information and Cyber Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asset- and Time-Aware Evidence-to-Control Mapping and Contradiction Detection for OT Cybersecurity Assessment

Muhammad Ali Arshad
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Information and Cyber Security
article

Asset- and Time-Aware Evidence-to-Control Mapping and Contradiction Detection for OT Cybersecurity Assessment

Muhammad Ali Arshad
article en

Abstract

This paper proposes an asset- and time-aware methodology for evidence-to-control mapping and contradiction detection in Operational Technology (OT) cybersecurity assessment. The proposed methodology focuses on structured evidence-to-objective mapping, asset and temporal context analysis, contradiction classification, and provenance-constrained assessment generation. The study proposes a comparative evaluation of three approaches: non-structured Large Language Model (LLM) assessment, conventional Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), and a structured, provenance-aware framework. The research uses NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3 as its primary OT security reference. A benchmark design of 60 base scenarios and five evidence conditions per scenario is proposed. Research status: This is a methodology-focused proposed-framework preprint. Dataset construction, independent annotation, implementation validation, and quantitative experimental evaluation remain pending. No empirical performance improvements or statistical findings are claimed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Information and Cyber Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon