Heterogeneous Decarbonization: Technology-Specific Renewable Shocks and Asymmetric Emissions Responses Across the Global Economy

Abstract Why do technology-specific changes in renewable output produce different emissions and economic outcomes across economies? This paper examines this question using a technology-disaggregated GTAP-E-Power model covering eight regions and twenty-two sectors, complemented by panel evidence from 56 countries over 2000–2023 and machine-learning robustness analysis. The structural experiments impose region-specific counterfactual output changes separately for solarP, windBL, and otherBL zero-emission generation across all eight regions. Under the SolarP experiment, production-based emissions associated with the modeled activity increase by $$39.39\%$$ in the United States but decline by $$32.04\%$$ in India, reflecting input and cross-technology reallocation toward emissions-generating production in the United States, in contrast to broader production contraction in India. Trade further transmits these adjustments through relative prices and export flows, generating heterogeneous welfare effects. Complementing these structural results, panel estimates associate a $$1\%$$ increase in renewable energy consumption with an average $$0.30\%$$ reduction in emissions, while income-group estimates reveal substantial heterogeneity. Taken together, the results show that the average negative renewable–emissions relationship does not imply uniform technology-specific outcomes. Regional production, substitution, and trade structures determine how renewable-output changes are transmitted into emissions and welfare.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-026-00485-4
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Heterogeneous Decarbonization: Technology-Specific Renewable Shocks and Asymmetric Emissions Responses Across the Global Economy

Wasiu Babajide Akintunde
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Heterogeneous Decarbonization: Technology-Specific Renewable Shocks and Asymmetric Emissions Responses Across the Global Economy

Wasiu Babajide Akintunde
article en

Abstract

Abstract Why do technology-specific changes in renewable output produce different emissions and economic outcomes across economies? This paper examines this question using a technology-disaggregated GTAP-E-Power model covering eight regions and twenty-two sectors, complemented by panel evidence from 56 countries over 2000–2023 and machine-learning robustness analysis. The structural experiments impose region-specific counterfactual output changes separately for solarP, windBL, and otherBL zero-emission generation across all eight regions. Under the SolarP experiment, production-based emissions associated with the modeled activity increase by $$39.39\%$$ in the United States but decline by $$32.04\%$$ in India, reflecting input and cross-technology reallocation toward emissions-generating production in the United States, in contrast to broader production contraction in India. Trade further transmits these adjustments through relative prices and export flows, generating heterogeneous welfare effects. Complementing these structural results, panel estimates associate a $$1\%$$ increase in renewable energy consumption with an average $$0.30\%$$ reduction in emissions, while income-group estimates reveal substantial heterogeneity. Taken together, the results show that the average negative renewable–emissions relationship does not imply uniform technology-specific outcomes. Regional production, substitution, and trade structures determine how renewable-output changes are transmitted into emissions and welfare.

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon