Building a Culture of Safety Through Faculty Mentorship: The Peer Pairing Framework for Clinical Nurse Educators

Background Clinical nurse educators often transition from bedside practice to clinical education in high-risk settings without structured support. Limited or absent mentorship during this transition may affect educator confidence, student learning outcomes, patient outcomes, and the ability to sustain a culture of safety. Although mentorship is widely recommended in nursing education, implementation strategies remain limited. The Peer Pairing Framework was developed as a staged mentorship approach to support clinical nurse educators and inform a comprehensive mentorship model. Methods The Peer Pairing Framework was informed by a voluntary onboarding survey of 914 clinical faculty, of whom 73.52% expressed interest in having a mentor and 88% expressed interest in serving as mentors. Stage 1 paired experienced and novice clinical nurse educators in an academic quarter-long mentorship experience. A mixed-methods evaluation included 5 pre- and post-experience Likert-scale survey questions aligned with Certified Nurse Educator (CNE) and Academic Clinical Nurse Educator Certification (CNEcl) competencies, assessing 5 mentorship pillars: Retention/Intent to Stay, Sense of Community/Support, Competence, Confidence, and Growth/Engagement. Qualitative feedback was also collected. Results There were 53 participants representing 7 campuses that completed the mentorship experience. Participants completing the post-experience survey reported a mean score of 4.77 versus a baseline mean score of 4.35. The highest-rated domains were retention/intent to stay (5.00), confidence (5.00), and competence (4.86), while community/support (4.28) and professional growth (4.25) identified areas for improvement. Although statistical significance was not demonstrated, findings suggested there is potential for clinical significance. Further, qualitative findings highlighted peer support, professional connection, resource sharing, and role development for mentors and mentees. Conclusion The Peer Pairing Framework represents a mentorship strategy designed to strengthen workforce safety by supporting clinical nurse educators during the transition into academia. Preliminary findings suggest that peer faculty mentorship may enhance retention, competence, confidence, and professional engagement while fostering a culture of safety in clinical learning environments. This staged approach offers a data-driven model for future comprehensive mentorship development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.2609
Primary Topic
Mentoring and Academic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building a Culture of Safety Through Faculty Mentorship: The Peer Pairing Framework for Clinical Nurse Educators

Clare A Chambers
HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine
Mentoring and Academic Development
article

Building a Culture of Safety Through Faculty Mentorship: The Peer Pairing Framework for Clinical Nurse Educators

Clare A Chambers
article en

Abstract

Background Clinical nurse educators often transition from bedside practice to clinical education in high-risk settings without structured support. Limited or absent mentorship during this transition may affect educator confidence, student learning outcomes, patient outcomes, and the ability to sustain a culture of safety. Although mentorship is widely recommended in nursing education, implementation strategies remain limited. The Peer Pairing Framework was developed as a staged mentorship approach to support clinical nurse educators and inform a comprehensive mentorship model. Methods The Peer Pairing Framework was informed by a voluntary onboarding survey of 914 clinical faculty, of whom 73.52% expressed interest in having a mentor and 88% expressed interest in serving as mentors. Stage 1 paired experienced and novice clinical nurse educators in an academic quarter-long mentorship experience. A mixed-methods evaluation included 5 pre- and post-experience Likert-scale survey questions aligned with Certified Nurse Educator (CNE) and Academic Clinical Nurse Educator Certification (CNEcl) competencies, assessing 5 mentorship pillars: Retention/Intent to Stay, Sense of Community/Support, Competence, Confidence, and Growth/Engagement. Qualitative feedback was also collected. Results There were 53 participants representing 7 campuses that completed the mentorship experience. Participants completing the post-experience survey reported a mean score of 4.77 versus a baseline mean score of 4.35. The highest-rated domains were retention/intent to stay (5.00), confidence (5.00), and competence (4.86), while community/support (4.28) and professional growth (4.25) identified areas for improvement. Although statistical significance was not demonstrated, findings suggested there is potential for clinical significance. Further, qualitative findings highlighted peer support, professional connection, resource sharing, and role development for mentors and mentees. Conclusion The Peer Pairing Framework represents a mentorship strategy designed to strengthen workforce safety by supporting clinical nurse educators during the transition into academia. Preliminary findings suggest that peer faculty mentorship may enhance retention, competence, confidence, and professional engagement while fostering a culture of safety in clinical learning environments. This staged approach offers a data-driven model for future comprehensive mentorship development.

HCA Healthcare Journal of MedicineVol. 7(5)
Galen College of Nursing (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Mentoring and Academic Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon