Individualized functional connectome identifies treatment-response biomarkers in patients with depression

Functional connectivity studies implicate circuit dysfunction in depression. However, group-level analyses have not yielded reliable neuroimaging biomarkers for treatment response. Given inter-subject heterogeneity in brain organization, individualized network mapping may better capture the neural correlates of clinical state and treatment response. However, how antidepressant therapies modulate individualized connectivity patterns remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether personalized functional connectomes can identify treatment-response biomarkers associated with antidepressant-related symptom improvement, and to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms in depression. We employed individualized brain parcellation to map subject-specific functional regions in 34 depression patients. Using these personalized networks, we identified cortical connectivity biomarkers that tracked longitudinal changes in functional connections following antidepressant treatments. The performance of these symptom-tracking biomarkers was evaluated via cross-validation and compared directly with conventional group-level atlas-based approaches. Change of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores was associated with dysconnectivity between key large-scale networks, particularly the default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (dATN), and frontoparietal control network (FPN). A subset of connections between these networks tracked improvement in depressive symptoms after treatment. The individualized analysis showed a significant association with symptom changes, whereas the group-level atlas-based analysis did not. While individualized parcellation systematically reduced the absolute strength of between-network connections, these refined signals demonstrated stronger clinical relevance. Our findings demonstrate that alterations in functional connectivity among the DMN, dATN, and FPN constitute candidate treatment-response biomarkers associated with clinical symptom improvement in depression. Functional connectivity derived from personalized parcellation may serve as a candidate treatment-agnostic biomarker of antidepressant treatment response, highlighting the importance of moving toward individualized neuroimaging approaches to better understand and track clinical outcomes in depression. However, treatment-specific and externally validated biomarkers remain to be established. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR-IOR-15007551) on 10 December 2015.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-026-08811-6
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individualized functional connectome identifies treatment-response biomarkers in patients with depression

赵冰骢, Jing Li, Chuan Shi, Tuya Bao et al.
BMC Psychiatry
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
article

Individualized functional connectome identifies treatment-response biomarkers in patients with depression

赵冰骢, Jing Li, Chuan Shi, Tuya Bao, Hesheng Liu, Xin Wang, Meiling Li, Danhong Wang, Xinjing Yang, Yufeng Xie, Yang Sun
article en

Abstract

Functional connectivity studies implicate circuit dysfunction in depression. However, group-level analyses have not yielded reliable neuroimaging biomarkers for treatment response. Given inter-subject heterogeneity in brain organization, individualized network mapping may better capture the neural correlates of clinical state and treatment response. However, how antidepressant therapies modulate individualized connectivity patterns remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether personalized functional connectomes can identify treatment-response biomarkers associated with antidepressant-related symptom improvement, and to elucidate the underlying neural mechanisms in depression. We employed individualized brain parcellation to map subject-specific functional regions in 34 depression patients. Using these personalized networks, we identified cortical connectivity biomarkers that tracked longitudinal changes in functional connections following antidepressant treatments. The performance of these symptom-tracking biomarkers was evaluated via cross-validation and compared directly with conventional group-level atlas-based approaches. Change of Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores was associated with dysconnectivity between key large-scale networks, particularly the default mode network (DMN), dorsal attention network (dATN), and frontoparietal control network (FPN). A subset of connections between these networks tracked improvement in depressive symptoms after treatment. The individualized analysis showed a significant association with symptom changes, whereas the group-level atlas-based analysis did not. While individualized parcellation systematically reduced the absolute strength of between-network connections, these refined signals demonstrated stronger clinical relevance. Our findings demonstrate that alterations in functional connectivity among the DMN, dATN, and FPN constitute candidate treatment-response biomarkers associated with clinical symptom improvement in depression. Functional connectivity derived from personalized parcellation may serve as a candidate treatment-agnostic biomarker of antidepressant treatment response, highlighting the importance of moving toward individualized neuroimaging approaches to better understand and track clinical outcomes in depression. However, treatment-specific and externally validated biomarkers remain to be established. This study was registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR, www.chictr.org.cn , ChiCTR-IOR-15007551) on 10 December 2015.

BMC Psychiatry
Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine (CN), McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US), Beijing University of Chinese Medicine (CN), Capital Medical University (CN), Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Peking University Sixth Hospital (CN), Changping Laboratory (CN), China Research Center on Aging (CN), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon