Technology as Power: Acceleration, Divergence, and the Reconfiguration of Agency

This paper analyses the contemporary acceleration of artificial intelligence as the surface expression of a longer technological and institutional reconfiguration. Aaron Levie's 30 October 2026 observation of a non-converging, vertically advancing AI frontier is situated within structural diagnoses first advanced in 2021 concerning relocated collusion, power concentration through protocol and access, and the systematic bounding of individual agency. The analysis then develops a multi-domain trajectory: a 2026–2027 paradigm-shifting window; artificial general intelligence on or before 2030; biological interfacing (cellular computers, photosynthesis-like power production, mitochondria-analogue decision systems) by approximately 2035; novel energy and power mechanisms by 2040; and the obsolescence of present-form state systems for a majority of states between 2031 and 2035. These claims are tested against current laboratory timelines, aggregated forecasting platforms, Perpetual Five-Year Technology (PFYT) theory, polycentric and network-state governance models, and energy-system data. The central argument is that technology is becoming the primary substrate of power. Institutional forms whose legitimacy and capacity rest on slower feedback loops are structurally mismatched to the tempo of change. The relevant response is not accelerated adaptation inside existing frames but the deliberate design of fluid, adaptive, agentic, and agile architectures capable of preserving agency under conditions of continuous reconfiguration. Written in a personal capacity; the views expressed are those of the author. Published in the KSCCN series.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23845135
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Technology as Power: Acceleration, Divergence, and the Reconfiguration of Agency

Syed Muntasir Mamun
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Technology as Power: Acceleration, Divergence, and the Reconfiguration of Agency

Syed Muntasir Mamun
article en

Abstract

This paper analyses the contemporary acceleration of artificial intelligence as the surface expression of a longer technological and institutional reconfiguration. Aaron Levie's 30 October 2026 observation of a non-converging, vertically advancing AI frontier is situated within structural diagnoses first advanced in 2021 concerning relocated collusion, power concentration through protocol and access, and the systematic bounding of individual agency. The analysis then develops a multi-domain trajectory: a 2026–2027 paradigm-shifting window; artificial general intelligence on or before 2030; biological interfacing (cellular computers, photosynthesis-like power production, mitochondria-analogue decision systems) by approximately 2035; novel energy and power mechanisms by 2040; and the obsolescence of present-form state systems for a majority of states between 2031 and 2035. These claims are tested against current laboratory timelines, aggregated forecasting platforms, Perpetual Five-Year Technology (PFYT) theory, polycentric and network-state governance models, and energy-system data. The central argument is that technology is becoming the primary substrate of power. Institutional forms whose legitimacy and capacity rest on slower feedback loops are structurally mismatched to the tempo of change. The relevant response is not accelerated adaptation inside existing frames but the deliberate design of fluid, adaptive, agentic, and agile architectures capable of preserving agency under conditions of continuous reconfiguration. Written in a personal capacity; the views expressed are those of the author. Published in the KSCCN series.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon