¿Cómo puedo cambiarme el nombre y apellido en Perú? Guía para realizar el proceso Judicial.

Name changes (given name or surname) in Peru are not resolved by mere will or through administrative proceedings. Article 29 of the Civil Code conditions such changes on a justified motive, judicial authorization, publication, and registration. This article is presented as a complementary perspective to that of Huanca Villalta and Huanca Villalta (2026) regarding the name change process as a fundamental component of identity. It adopts the viewpoints of both the applicant and the lawyer intervening in the judicial process, converting them into two routes within the same case file, insofar as it expands identity and addresses discrimination. The first perspective accounts for six stages that describe the path of the applicant, client, or represented party. The second perspective considers eight stages that describe the path of the litigating attorney in the judicial process.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.71112/zpx4rf09
Primary Topic
Family and Matrimonial Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

¿Cómo puedo cambiarme el nombre y apellido en Perú? Guía para realizar el proceso Judicial.

Juan Jose Huanca Villalta
Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las Ciencias
Family and Matrimonial Law
article

¿Cómo puedo cambiarme el nombre y apellido en Perú? Guía para realizar el proceso Judicial.

Juan Jose Huanca Villalta
article en

Abstract

Name changes (given name or surname) in Peru are not resolved by mere will or through administrative proceedings. Article 29 of the Civil Code conditions such changes on a justified motive, judicial authorization, publication, and registration. This article is presented as a complementary perspective to that of Huanca Villalta and Huanca Villalta (2026) regarding the name change process as a fundamental component of identity. It adopts the viewpoints of both the applicant and the lawyer intervening in the judicial process, converting them into two routes within the same case file, insofar as it expands identity and addresses discrimination. The first perspective accounts for six stages that describe the path of the applicant, client, or represented party. The second perspective considers eight stages that describe the path of the litigating attorney in the judicial process.

Revista Multidisciplinar Epistemología de las CienciasVol. 3(4)
Universidad Nacional de San Agustin de Arequipa (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Family and Matrimonial Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon