Identifying optimal straw return strategies for crop production using meta‐analysis and interpretable machine learning

Abstract BACKGROUND Straw return is widely promoted to improve soil fertility and crop productivity, but its climate consequences remain uncertain because yield gains may be accompanied by increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A total of 5570 observations from published field studies were synthesized to quantify global responses of crop yield, N₂O, CO₂, CH₄, global warming potential (GWP), and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) to straw incorporation. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Shapley additive explanations, and bootstrap analysis were integrated to identify the dominant drivers and management thresholds for balancing productivity and climate impacts. RESULTS Straw return increased crop yield by 5.02%, but also increased N₂O emissions by 12.64%, CO₂ emissions by 31.39%, and CH₄ emissions by 34.85%, resulting in increases of 57.30% in GWP and 80.94% in GHGI. These responses were strongly regulated by crop type, straw‐return rate, incorporation depth, return duration, fertilization, and climatic conditions. Straw‐return rate was the dominant predictor of N 2 O emissions, whereas mean annual precipitation was the primary predictor of CO 2 and CH 4 emissions. Management practices involving a straw‐return rate of approximately 5 t ha⁻¹, a return duration of 1–3 years, and the use of maize or wheat straw rather than rice straw were associated with a more favorable balance between crop yield and GHG emissions. Estimated agronomic thresholds for fertilization were 180 kg N ha −1 , 75 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 , and 180 kg K 2 O ha −1 , whereas environmental thresholds for limiting GWP and GHGI were 210 kg N ha −1 , 40–100 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 , and 100 kg K 2 O ha −1 . CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate that straw return is not universally beneficial for the climate but can be optimized through crop‐specific and climate‐adapted residue and nutrient management. The study provides global quantitative evidence for designing climate‐smart straw‐return strategies that reconcile food production with GHG mitigation across agroecosystems. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.71188
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying optimal straw return strategies for crop production using meta‐analysis and interpretable machine learning

Qianyun Deng, Zhiming Qi, Zijian Wang, Qi Lü et al.
Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Identifying optimal straw return strategies for crop production using meta‐analysis and interpretable machine learning

Qianyun Deng, Zhiming Qi, Zijian Wang, Qi Lü, Youliang Zhang, Shaoyuan Feng, Xiaoming Li, Yu Guo, Chengfeng Chen, Han Guo, Xuewen Gong
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Straw return is widely promoted to improve soil fertility and crop productivity, but its climate consequences remain uncertain because yield gains may be accompanied by increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A total of 5570 observations from published field studies were synthesized to quantify global responses of crop yield, N₂O, CO₂, CH₄, global warming potential (GWP), and greenhouse gas intensity (GHGI) to straw incorporation. Extreme Gradient Boosting, Shapley additive explanations, and bootstrap analysis were integrated to identify the dominant drivers and management thresholds for balancing productivity and climate impacts. RESULTS Straw return increased crop yield by 5.02%, but also increased N₂O emissions by 12.64%, CO₂ emissions by 31.39%, and CH₄ emissions by 34.85%, resulting in increases of 57.30% in GWP and 80.94% in GHGI. These responses were strongly regulated by crop type, straw‐return rate, incorporation depth, return duration, fertilization, and climatic conditions. Straw‐return rate was the dominant predictor of N 2 O emissions, whereas mean annual precipitation was the primary predictor of CO 2 and CH 4 emissions. Management practices involving a straw‐return rate of approximately 5 t ha⁻¹, a return duration of 1–3 years, and the use of maize or wheat straw rather than rice straw were associated with a more favorable balance between crop yield and GHG emissions. Estimated agronomic thresholds for fertilization were 180 kg N ha −1 , 75 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 , and 180 kg K 2 O ha −1 , whereas environmental thresholds for limiting GWP and GHGI were 210 kg N ha −1 , 40–100 kg P 2 O 5 ha −1 , and 100 kg K 2 O ha −1 . CONCLUSION These findings demonstrate that straw return is not universally beneficial for the climate but can be optimized through crop‐specific and climate‐adapted residue and nutrient management. The study provides global quantitative evidence for designing climate‐smart straw‐return strategies that reconcile food production with GHG mitigation across agroecosystems. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (CN), McGill University (CA), China Agricultural University (CN), Yangzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon