How often can migration switch a population above or below its total carrying capacity? Five crossings in three logistic patches, and bounds for any number of patches

Unrefereed research candidate. Habitat patches linked by migration: does migration raise or lower the total equilibrium population B relative to the sum S of the patches' carrying capacities? In the standard logistic patch model with an arbitrary irreducible, conservative (possibly asymmetric) migration network, B can switch between above and below S several times as the overall migration intensity grows. Elbetch, Benzekri, Massart and Sari (2022) found three such crossings with three patches and asked for a proof that three is the maximum, and for bounds with more patches. This package answers both requests: three patches allow exactly five crossings (an explicit rational example, certified in exact arithmetic, and a direct algebraic proof that six are impossible); for n patches there are at most 2n−3 crossings unless B is identically S, with no genericity assumption; and for every n ≥ 3 there are n-patch networks with at least n+2 crossings, with an exact four-patch certificate giving six. The five-crossing example has at least three separate peaks of total biomass. Effect sizes: tiny. In the three-patch example B differs from S by at most about 3.3 parts per million between crossings (numerical), approaching a 249 ppm shortfall at high migration; one migration rate is about 1/430 of the largest and the example is finely tuned. The results describe what the model allows, not observations of real populations. The archive contains the 13-page manuscript (PDF and LaTeX), exact standard-library checkers that do not rely on assert, numerical figure tools with pinned dependencies, 12 semantic negative controls, CI and SHA-256 sums. Assurance: written proofs and exact rational certificates; internal AI-assisted review only (not peer review, independent reproduction or formal verification); priority bounded to the recorded search. Related release: doi:10.5281/zenodo.23687852. Creator: Anonymous. Text and data CC0-1.0; code MIT.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23838087
Primary Topic
Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

How often can migration switch a population above or below its total carrying capacity? Five crossings in three logistic patches, and bounds for any number of patches

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
preprint

How often can migration switch a population above or below its total carrying capacity? Five crossings in three logistic patches, and bounds for any number of patches

preprint en

Abstract

Unrefereed research candidate. Habitat patches linked by migration: does migration raise or lower the total equilibrium population B relative to the sum S of the patches' carrying capacities? In the standard logistic patch model with an arbitrary irreducible, conservative (possibly asymmetric) migration network, B can switch between above and below S several times as the overall migration intensity grows. Elbetch, Benzekri, Massart and Sari (2022) found three such crossings with three patches and asked for a proof that three is the maximum, and for bounds with more patches. This package answers both requests: three patches allow exactly five crossings (an explicit rational example, certified in exact arithmetic, and a direct algebraic proof that six are impossible); for n patches there are at most 2n−3 crossings unless B is identically S, with no genericity assumption; and for every n ≥ 3 there are n-patch networks with at least n+2 crossings, with an exact four-patch certificate giving six. The five-crossing example has at least three separate peaks of total biomass. Effect sizes: tiny. In the three-patch example B differs from S by at most about 3.3 parts per million between crossings (numerical), approaching a 249 ppm shortfall at high migration; one migration rate is about 1/430 of the largest and the example is finely tuned. The results describe what the model allows, not observations of real populations. The archive contains the 13-page manuscript (PDF and LaTeX), exact standard-library checkers that do not rely on assert, numerical figure tools with pinned dependencies, 12 semantic negative controls, CI and SHA-256 sums. Assurance: written proofs and exact rational certificates; internal AI-assisted review only (not peer review, independent reproduction or formal verification); priority bounded to the recorded search. Related release: doi:10.5281/zenodo.23687852. Creator: Anonymous. Text and data CC0-1.0; code MIT.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
How often can migration switch a population above or below its total carrying capacity? Five crossings in three logistic patches, and bounds for any number of patches · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS