Inequality in secondary fracture prevention supports prioritisation of fracture liaison services in coastal health plans in England and Wales

Abstract Summary The 2021 UK Chief Medical Officers' annual report highlighted poorer health in coastal communities but did not include osteoporosis or secondary fracture prevention. Using Fracture Liaison Services database (FLS-DB) data, FLSs in coastal areas were shown to have poorer performance and lower parenteral osteoporosis medication recommendation rates, supporting inclusion of FLSs in coastal health improvement plans. A number of studies have highlighted socio-economic deprivation as a predictor of fragility fractures and poorer outcomes after fracture. In parallel, coastal areas are recognised to be areas with poorer health outcomes, in part due to socio-economic deprivation. Purpose To describe secondary fracture prevention in terms of FLS provision and quality in coastal vs. non-coastal healthcare settings using routinely collected audit data. Methods A cross-sectional, ecological analysis using the missed opportunity counts from the national Fracture Liaison Service (FLS-DB) and Hip Fracture (NHFD) Databases of England and Wales audit data with Office for National Statistics classification of coastal towns. Results Results Coastal sites were not significantly more likely to be non-FLS vs FLS providers (38% vs 24%, p = 0.18). However, coastal FLSs had higher missed opportunity patient counts than non-coastal FLSs ( p = 0.02), with lower vertebral identification rates (14.2% vs 20.9%, p = 0.02). While treatment rates were similar, coastal FLSs had significantly lower rates of parenteral anti-resorptive therapy recommended ( p < 0.001). Conclusion We have demonstrated a coastal deleterious effect on the quality of secondary fracture prevention of FLS providers as measured by missed opportunities for treatment, vertebral fracture identification and recommendation of parenteral anti-resorptive therapies. Coastal health priority plans in the NHS should prioritise effective FLS provision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archives of Osteoporosis
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-026-01786-7
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inequality in secondary fracture prevention supports prioritisation of fracture liaison services in coastal health plans in England and Wales

MK Javaid, F. Clemeno, L. Pugh, R. Ghumman
Archives of Osteoporosis
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Inequality in secondary fracture prevention supports prioritisation of fracture liaison services in coastal health plans in England and Wales

MK Javaid, F. Clemeno, L. Pugh, R. Ghumman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Summary The 2021 UK Chief Medical Officers' annual report highlighted poorer health in coastal communities but did not include osteoporosis or secondary fracture prevention. Using Fracture Liaison Services database (FLS-DB) data, FLSs in coastal areas were shown to have poorer performance and lower parenteral osteoporosis medication recommendation rates, supporting inclusion of FLSs in coastal health improvement plans. A number of studies have highlighted socio-economic deprivation as a predictor of fragility fractures and poorer outcomes after fracture. In parallel, coastal areas are recognised to be areas with poorer health outcomes, in part due to socio-economic deprivation. Purpose To describe secondary fracture prevention in terms of FLS provision and quality in coastal vs. non-coastal healthcare settings using routinely collected audit data. Methods A cross-sectional, ecological analysis using the missed opportunity counts from the national Fracture Liaison Service (FLS-DB) and Hip Fracture (NHFD) Databases of England and Wales audit data with Office for National Statistics classification of coastal towns. Results Results Coastal sites were not significantly more likely to be non-FLS vs FLS providers (38% vs 24%, p = 0.18). However, coastal FLSs had higher missed opportunity patient counts than non-coastal FLSs ( p = 0.02), with lower vertebral identification rates (14.2% vs 20.9%, p = 0.02). While treatment rates were similar, coastal FLSs had significantly lower rates of parenteral anti-resorptive therapy recommended ( p < 0.001). Conclusion We have demonstrated a coastal deleterious effect on the quality of secondary fracture prevention of FLS providers as measured by missed opportunities for treatment, vertebral fracture identification and recommendation of parenteral anti-resorptive therapies. Coastal health priority plans in the NHS should prioritise effective FLS provision.

Archives of OsteoporosisVol. 21(1)
Sherwood Forest Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Oxford (GB), Royal College of Physicians (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon