Topological Ethics paper 2

This technical report is the companion to the concept paper "Topological Ethics: A Geometric Framing for Alignment Regularizers" and documents its four gridworld experiments in full. Each experiment tests a penalty that protects a simulated human's option-space, the cells it can reach. The report gives the methods, every setting with its exact optimum, and the hypotheses with when each was stated. It also includes a disclosed design history covering an invalid early experiment, a discarded layout, and two bugs that were found and fixed. In brief: the penalty kept agents from trapping a stationary human; a candidate formalization of "torsion" added nothing; penalties checked only at periodic audits missed restrictions between checks; with a goal-seeking human, the penalty achieved safety mainly by avoidance; and cooperation appeared only when the penalty encoded a forecast of the human's next one or two moves. Code and data, which reproduce every reported number, are at doi:10.5281/zenodo.23841251. AI disclosure: The experiment code, analyses, and editing were carried out with the assistance of Claude (Anthropic).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23842861
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Topological Ethics paper 2

David Porbeck
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Topological Ethics paper 2

David Porbeck
article en

Abstract

This technical report is the companion to the concept paper "Topological Ethics: A Geometric Framing for Alignment Regularizers" and documents its four gridworld experiments in full. Each experiment tests a penalty that protects a simulated human's option-space, the cells it can reach. The report gives the methods, every setting with its exact optimum, and the hypotheses with when each was stated. It also includes a disclosed design history covering an invalid early experiment, a discarded layout, and two bugs that were found and fixed. In brief: the penalty kept agents from trapping a stationary human; a candidate formalization of "torsion" added nothing; penalties checked only at periodic audits missed restrictions between checks; with a goal-seeking human, the penalty achieved safety mainly by avoidance; and cooperation appeared only when the penalty encoded a forecast of the human's next one or two moves. Code and data, which reproduce every reported number, are at doi:10.5281/zenodo.23841251. AI disclosure: The experiment code, analyses, and editing were carried out with the assistance of Claude (Anthropic).

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Topological Ethics paper 2 — David Porbeck · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS