A Typology of Pro-Hijab Approaches in Iran from the Naseri Era to the End of the First Pahlavi Period (1848–1948)

This study presents a typology of pro-hijab approaches in Iran from the Naseri era to the end of the First Pahlavi period. Using qualitative content analysis, it examines hijab advocates' views in response to the dissident current. The findings identify two types of advocates: “maximalist traditionalist” (with explanatory and promotional sub-approaches) and “religious modernist” (with a reformist approach). The explanatory approach emphasized rational and textual necessities of maximal covering, while the promotional approach promoted hijab through rational and social arguments. The religious modernist type, relying on new interpretations of Quranic concepts, sought a novel understanding of hijab in society and distanced itself from maximal hijab. Notable points include the two currents' inverse movement: dissidents moved from easy hijab to unveiling, while advocates moved from maximal hijab to more comfortable hijab. State repression during the First Pahlavi period shifted advocates’ strategy from producing scientific content to minimally preserving religion. This intellectual confrontation became one of the most important cultural conflicts in contemporary Iranian history.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lentera Jurnal
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64271/k59vy047
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Typology of Pro-Hijab Approaches in Iran from the Naseri Era to the End of the First Pahlavi Period (1848–1948)

Fatemeh ShakibRokh, Nahid Tayyebi
Lentera Jurnal
Islamic Studies and History
article

A Typology of Pro-Hijab Approaches in Iran from the Naseri Era to the End of the First Pahlavi Period (1848–1948)

Fatemeh ShakibRokh, Nahid Tayyebi
article en

Abstract

This study presents a typology of pro-hijab approaches in Iran from the Naseri era to the end of the First Pahlavi period. Using qualitative content analysis, it examines hijab advocates' views in response to the dissident current. The findings identify two types of advocates: “maximalist traditionalist” (with explanatory and promotional sub-approaches) and “religious modernist” (with a reformist approach). The explanatory approach emphasized rational and textual necessities of maximal covering, while the promotional approach promoted hijab through rational and social arguments. The religious modernist type, relying on new interpretations of Quranic concepts, sought a novel understanding of hijab in society and distanced itself from maximal hijab. Notable points include the two currents' inverse movement: dissidents moved from easy hijab to unveiling, while advocates moved from maximal hijab to more comfortable hijab. State repression during the First Pahlavi period shifted advocates’ strategy from producing scientific content to minimally preserving religion. This intellectual confrontation became one of the most important cultural conflicts in contemporary Iranian history.

Lentera JurnalVol. 2(2)
Alzahra University (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
A Typology of Pro-Hijab Approaches in Iran from the Naseri Era to the End of the First Pahlavi Period (1848–1948) — Fatemeh ShakibRokh, Nahid Tayyebi · Lentera Jurnal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS