How I Check My Own Research: Five Simple Reproducibility Tests for African Students, Built and Tried on My Own Work

Many published findings cannot be repeated, and students rarely learn how to catch errors before they print them. This proposal describes five checks that any student with a laptop and free Python can run on their own work before submitting it. The checks ask whether every reference exists, whether reported test scores agree with each other, whether a reported average is even possible, whether the computer program finished its job, and whether the data can tell the model's numbers apart. I built the checks into one short script and ran them on my own earlier drafts. They found two references that do not exist, an F1 score of 0.76 that should have been about 0.34, a simulation that quietly stopped halfway, and model parameters that could not be estimated. The proposal plans a workshop for Nigerian students and a test of whether the checks catch planted errors.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23844789
Primary Topic
Academic integrity and plagiarism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How I Check My Own Research: Five Simple Reproducibility Tests for African Students, Built and Tried on My Own Work

Kelechi Ogbonna
1 links
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Academic integrity and plagiarism
article

How I Check My Own Research: Five Simple Reproducibility Tests for African Students, Built and Tried on My Own Work

Kelechi Ogbonna
article en

Abstract

Many published findings cannot be repeated, and students rarely learn how to catch errors before they print them. This proposal describes five checks that any student with a laptop and free Python can run on their own work before submitting it. The checks ask whether every reference exists, whether reported test scores agree with each other, whether a reported average is even possible, whether the computer program finished its job, and whether the data can tell the model's numbers apart. I built the checks into one short script and ran them on my own earlier drafts. They found two references that do not exist, an F1 score of 0.76 that should have been about 0.34, a simulation that quietly stopped halfway, and model parameters that could not be estimated. The proposal plans a workshop for Nigerian students and a test of whether the checks catch planted errors.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Academic integrity and plagiarism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon