Public health and healthcare perspectives on collaboration for population health management: findings from a deliberative dialogue in Ontario and Alberta

Public health focuses on improving population-wide health, while healthcare systems provide care to individuals and communities. The Quadruple Aim framework includes population health as one of its four goals, yet its suitability for guiding cross-sector collaboration remains uncertain. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for effective partnerships between public health and healthcare to address population-level challenges. This study explores how leaders from both sectors perceive and approach collaboration to improve population health and identifies enablers and barriers to joint action. We conducted five virtual deliberative dialogues with public health leaders, healthcare leaders, and policymakers in Canada. We analyzed transcripts using reflective thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes. Rigour was enhanced through reflexivity, member checking, double coding, and detailed documentation to ensure credibility, transparency, and consistency in the analysis. Three themes were generated: [1] population health as a shared priority with divergent meanings, ; [2] resource constraints limit public health’s role in collaboration; and [3] equity-driven approach to future population health planning. Together, these themes reveal both shared priorities and structural barriers shaping cross-sector collaboration. This deliberative dialogue found that public health-healthcare collaboration was perceived to work best when priorities were shared and strategies aligned across sectors. Future collaborations should anticipate challenges related to fragmented data-sharing systems, differing organizational mandates, and limited cross-sector understanding, while developing flexible mechanisms for shared planning, accountability, and resource coordination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-10-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15786-3
Primary Topic
Public Health Policies and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Public health and healthcare perspectives on collaboration for population health management: findings from a deliberative dialogue in Ontario and Alberta

Jinfan Rose Qiang, Lindsay Hedden, Andrew David Pinto, Amélie Quesnel‐Vallée et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Public Health Policies and Education
article

Public health and healthcare perspectives on collaboration for population health management: findings from a deliberative dialogue in Ontario and Alberta

Jinfan Rose Qiang, Lindsay Hedden, Andrew David Pinto, Amélie Quesnel‐Vallée, Jasmine Pawa, Hibah Sehar, Laura C. Rosella, Gaynor Watson-Creed, Matthew Menear, Sacha Bhatia, Isabelle Fortuna, Joseph J. O’Rourke
article en

Abstract

Public health focuses on improving population-wide health, while healthcare systems provide care to individuals and communities. The Quadruple Aim framework includes population health as one of its four goals, yet its suitability for guiding cross-sector collaboration remains uncertain. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for effective partnerships between public health and healthcare to address population-level challenges. This study explores how leaders from both sectors perceive and approach collaboration to improve population health and identifies enablers and barriers to joint action. We conducted five virtual deliberative dialogues with public health leaders, healthcare leaders, and policymakers in Canada. We analyzed transcripts using reflective thematic analysis to identify patterns and themes. Rigour was enhanced through reflexivity, member checking, double coding, and detailed documentation to ensure credibility, transparency, and consistency in the analysis. Three themes were generated: [1] population health as a shared priority with divergent meanings, ; [2] resource constraints limit public health’s role in collaboration; and [3] equity-driven approach to future population health planning. Together, these themes reveal both shared priorities and structural barriers shaping cross-sector collaboration. This deliberative dialogue found that public health-healthcare collaboration was perceived to work best when priorities were shared and strategies aligned across sectors. Future collaborations should anticipate challenges related to fragmented data-sharing systems, differing organizational mandates, and limited cross-sector understanding, while developing flexible mechanisms for shared planning, accountability, and resource coordination.

BMC Health Services Research
St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Dalhousie University (CA), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Université Laval (CA), Unity Health Toronto (CA), Ontario Health (CA), MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions (CA), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Public Health Policies and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon