Generative Ai In Higher Education: Learning Experiences And Challenges For Pre-Service Teachers

This article examines pre-service teachers’ learning experiences and the challenges they encounter when using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education, and proposes directions for supporting effective and responsible use. The study uses a quantitative survey of 408 students and a cross-sectional descriptive design, with a structured questionnaire employing a five-point Likert scale. The analysis focuses on purposes of GenAI use, perceived learning benefits, and challenges related to information reliability, source verification, independent thinking, academic integrity, and personal data protection. The article proposes developing AI literacy and verification skills, establishing transparent guidance, reforming assessment to emphasize thinking processes, strengthening lecturers’ guidance, and ensuring safe and equitable access. It positions GenAI as a tool that can support pre-service teachers’ self-directed learning and professional competence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal Papier Public Review
Published
2026-10-30
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative Ai In Higher Education: Learning Experiences And Challenges For Pre-Service Teachers

Huan Nguyen Duc
7 links
International Journal Papier Public Review
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Generative Ai In Higher Education: Learning Experiences And Challenges For Pre-Service Teachers

Huan Nguyen Duc
article en

Abstract

This article examines pre-service teachers’ learning experiences and the challenges they encounter when using generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in higher education, and proposes directions for supporting effective and responsible use. The study uses a quantitative survey of 408 students and a cross-sectional descriptive design, with a structured questionnaire employing a five-point Likert scale. The analysis focuses on purposes of GenAI use, perceived learning benefits, and challenges related to information reliability, source verification, independent thinking, academic integrity, and personal data protection. The article proposes developing AI literacy and verification skills, establishing transparent guidance, reforming assessment to emphasize thinking processes, strengthening lecturers’ guidance, and ensuring safe and equitable access. It positions GenAI as a tool that can support pre-service teachers’ self-directed learning and professional competence.

International Journal Papier Public Review
Thu Dau Mot University (VN)
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon