The Public Nature of Preaching Where Suffering Remains

This article argues that preaching language is already public insofar as it participates in the ecclesial and social conditions through which grief, testimony, silence, answerability, and God-language are heard. Drawing on survey responses from a feminist worship conference and survey and interpretive materials from a doctoral seminar on Job, the study uses qualitative theological-homiletical analysis in conversation with public theology. The analysis identifies recurring patterns in the materials: the pacing of interpretation, the protection of testimony, the cultivation of safety, the permission of silence, the formation of answerable relations, and the naming of God after unreceived grief. Interpreted through public theology, these patterns suggest that preaching’s public character lies less in the visibility of public issues than in the communal conditions its language forms for reception, recognition, and answerability before suffering.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Homiletics
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21827/ijh.10.1.45-58
Primary Topic
Theological Perspectives and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Public Nature of Preaching Where Suffering Remains

Eliana Ah-Rum Ku
2 links
International Journal of Homiletics
Theological Perspectives and Practices
article

The Public Nature of Preaching Where Suffering Remains

Eliana Ah-Rum Ku
article en

Abstract

This article argues that preaching language is already public insofar as it participates in the ecclesial and social conditions through which grief, testimony, silence, answerability, and God-language are heard. Drawing on survey responses from a feminist worship conference and survey and interpretive materials from a doctoral seminar on Job, the study uses qualitative theological-homiletical analysis in conversation with public theology. The analysis identifies recurring patterns in the materials: the pacing of interpretation, the protection of testimony, the cultivation of safety, the permission of silence, the formation of answerable relations, and the naming of God after unreceived grief. Interpreted through public theology, these patterns suggest that preaching’s public character lies less in the visibility of public issues than in the communal conditions its language forms for reception, recognition, and answerability before suffering.

International Journal of HomileticsVol. 10(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Theological Perspectives and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon