Integrating quantitative biometrics and automated risk stratification for ophthalmic surgical triage

Ophthalmology generates extensive quantitative data from ocular biometry and imaging, yet these device-derived measurements are often separated from medical, social, and utilization data in the electronic health record (EHR). No validated ophthalmic tool currently integrates these streams for real-time, patient-specific perioperative decision support. This mini-review examines how automated EHR-based risk stratification and quantitative ocular biometrics could support perioperative decision-making. Across surgical specialties, cancellation models using demographic, comorbidity, socioeconomic, and appointment-related variables have achieved development areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.75–0.92 with a validation range of 0.70–0.74. When the bundle is paired with targeted care pathways, reduced same-day cancellations have been observed, although bundle designs prevent quantifying the independent contribution of the model. In cataract surgery, Epic's Health Composite Score independently predicts same-day cancellation but provides only limited discrimination, and does not predict operative or postoperative outcomes, which remain more closely associated with ocular complexity and surgeon-related factors. Cataract and glaucoma literature identifies additional candidate predictors of technical complexity, surgical outcomes, and access, including pupil and lens characteristics, axial length, anterior chamber anatomy, prior ocular surgery, angle dimensions, conjunctival imaging, frailty, and social vulnerability. We propose an EHR-integrated framework with endpoint- and procedure-specific models for surgical readiness, technical complexity, and adverse outcomes. Each output should be linked to a defined response, such as patient navigation, anesthesia review, case assignment, operative setting, equipment planning, or intensified postoperative follow-up. Prospective multicenter development should assess whether model-guided interventions improve access, efficiency, and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1975712
Primary Topic
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Integrating quantitative biometrics and automated risk stratification for ophthalmic surgical triage

Jacob Craft, David Fleischman
2 links
Frontiers in Medicine
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
article

Integrating quantitative biometrics and automated risk stratification for ophthalmic surgical triage

Jacob Craft, David Fleischman
article en

Abstract

Ophthalmology generates extensive quantitative data from ocular biometry and imaging, yet these device-derived measurements are often separated from medical, social, and utilization data in the electronic health record (EHR). No validated ophthalmic tool currently integrates these streams for real-time, patient-specific perioperative decision support. This mini-review examines how automated EHR-based risk stratification and quantitative ocular biometrics could support perioperative decision-making. Across surgical specialties, cancellation models using demographic, comorbidity, socioeconomic, and appointment-related variables have achieved development areas under the curve (AUC) of 0.75–0.92 with a validation range of 0.70–0.74. When the bundle is paired with targeted care pathways, reduced same-day cancellations have been observed, although bundle designs prevent quantifying the independent contribution of the model. In cataract surgery, Epic's Health Composite Score independently predicts same-day cancellation but provides only limited discrimination, and does not predict operative or postoperative outcomes, which remain more closely associated with ocular complexity and surgeon-related factors. Cataract and glaucoma literature identifies additional candidate predictors of technical complexity, surgical outcomes, and access, including pupil and lens characteristics, axial length, anterior chamber anatomy, prior ocular surgery, angle dimensions, conjunctival imaging, frailty, and social vulnerability. We propose an EHR-integrated framework with endpoint- and procedure-specific models for surgical readiness, technical complexity, and adverse outcomes. Each output should be linked to a defined response, such as patient navigation, anesthesia review, case assignment, operative setting, equipment planning, or intensified postoperative follow-up. Prospective multicenter development should assess whether model-guided interventions improve access, efficiency, and outcomes.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 13
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Integrating quantitative biometrics and automated risk stratification for ophthalmic surgical triage — Jacob Craft, David Fleischman · Frontiers in Medicine (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS