Oculomics as a filtered window: biological mismatches and a task-specific performance ceiling hypothesis for systemic disease prediction

Introduction Oculomics has emerged as a promising approach for inferring systemic health from retinal and ocular imaging. However, the biological meaning and achievable performance of retinal biomarkers may vary substantially across systemic prediction tasks.Areas covered This Critical Perspective synthesizes evidence from retinal imaging, artificial intelligence, ocular biometry, vascular biology, blood-barrier biology, systemic disease prediction, and clinical prediction methodology. Relevant literature was identified through targeted searches of PubMed and reference-list screening. We propose a ten-domain mismatch framework spanning biological and structural, temporal and contextual, inferential and methodological, and translational factors. We also propose a task-specific performance ceiling hypothesis: retinal-based models may eventually show diminishing returns, with higher ceilings expected when the target systemic process is more directly represented in ocular tissues and lower ceilings when the relationship is biologically indirect.Expert opinion Oculomics should progress from proof-of-concept prediction toward clinically defined applications in which retinal information provides reproducible, incremental, and actionable value. Future studies should move from performance-driven development toward mismatch-aware evaluation, incorporating longitudinal validation, clinically coherent endpoints, external validation, calibration, confounder sensitivity analysis, and biologically grounded interpretability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2026.2754555
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Oculomics as a filtered window: biological mismatches and a task-specific performance ceiling hypothesis for systemic disease prediction

Tae Keun Yoo, Joon Yul Choi
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Oculomics as a filtered window: biological mismatches and a task-specific performance ceiling hypothesis for systemic disease prediction

Tae Keun Yoo, Joon Yul Choi
article en

Abstract

Introduction Oculomics has emerged as a promising approach for inferring systemic health from retinal and ocular imaging. However, the biological meaning and achievable performance of retinal biomarkers may vary substantially across systemic prediction tasks.Areas covered This Critical Perspective synthesizes evidence from retinal imaging, artificial intelligence, ocular biometry, vascular biology, blood-barrier biology, systemic disease prediction, and clinical prediction methodology. Relevant literature was identified through targeted searches of PubMed and reference-list screening. We propose a ten-domain mismatch framework spanning biological and structural, temporal and contextual, inferential and methodological, and translational factors. We also propose a task-specific performance ceiling hypothesis: retinal-based models may eventually show diminishing returns, with higher ceilings expected when the target systemic process is more directly represented in ocular tissues and lower ceilings when the relationship is biologically indirect.Expert opinion Oculomics should progress from proof-of-concept prediction toward clinically defined applications in which retinal information provides reproducible, incremental, and actionable value. Future studies should move from performance-driven development toward mismatch-aware evaluation, incorporating longitudinal validation, clinically coherent endpoints, external validation, calibration, confounder sensitivity analysis, and biologically grounded interpretability.

Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Yonsei University (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon