Data-Partitioning Sensitivity and Within-Session Stage Transfer in Vision-Based Garlic Soil Residue Grading on a Soil-Removal Test Bench

Continuously acquired garlic images can contain temporally related observations that affect soil residue grading estimates. This study assessed data-partitioning sensitivity and within-session acquisition-stage transfer using a two-stage You Only Look Once version 26 nano (YOLO26n) detector and EfficientNet-B0 classifier. The dataset comprised 754 red–green–blue (RGB) scene images and 10,721 bulb instances collected during one controlled session in which the conveyor operated at 0.5 m/s, while active vibratory soil removal was disabled (0 Hz vibration frequency and 0° screen inclination); inter-annotator agreement was high (quadratic-weighted Cohen’s κ = 0.8750; 360 instances). For seed 42, macro-averaged F1-score (Macro-F1) was 97.49% with random image splitting, 87.43% with 2 s temporal exclusion, and 76.32% with complete stage isolation. Three additional temporal-exclusion runs yielded 85.92 ± 1.38% Macro-F1. On a fixed S07 test set (26 scenes, 405 bulbs), replacing temporally neighboring training images with more distant same-stage images, while preserving training-scene and class-specific instance counts, changed Macro-F1 from 99.76% to 74.12%. In a three-seed, four-fold leave-one-stage-out (LOSO) evaluation, stage-based group distributionally robust optimization (Stage-GroupDRO) achieved 75.57% Stage-macro Macro-F1 versus 74.11% for class-weighted empirical risk minimization (Weighted-ERM), but the paired 95% confidence interval included zero. The full pipeline achieved 72.82% pooled end-to-end Macro-F1 at 19.32 frames per second (FPS) during offline evaluation. These results demonstrate substantial sensitivity to data partitioning within one acquisition session; external generalization, quantitative soil-removal efficiency, and closed-loop control remain untested.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Agriculture
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16212366
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Data-Partitioning Sensitivity and Within-Session Stage Transfer in Vision-Based Garlic Soil Residue Grading on a Soil-Removal Test Bench

Xueru Zhu, Hua Li, Shilong Qiu, Junjie Zang et al.
3 links
Agriculture
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Data-Partitioning Sensitivity and Within-Session Stage Transfer in Vision-Based Garlic Soil Residue Grading on a Soil-Removal Test Bench

Xueru Zhu, Hua Li, Shilong Qiu, Junjie Zang, Qinghui Zhao, Jieyi Fu
article en

Abstract

Continuously acquired garlic images can contain temporally related observations that affect soil residue grading estimates. This study assessed data-partitioning sensitivity and within-session acquisition-stage transfer using a two-stage You Only Look Once version 26 nano (YOLO26n) detector and EfficientNet-B0 classifier. The dataset comprised 754 red–green–blue (RGB) scene images and 10,721 bulb instances collected during one controlled session in which the conveyor operated at 0.5 m/s, while active vibratory soil removal was disabled (0 Hz vibration frequency and 0° screen inclination); inter-annotator agreement was high (quadratic-weighted Cohen’s κ = 0.8750; 360 instances). For seed 42, macro-averaged F1-score (Macro-F1) was 97.49% with random image splitting, 87.43% with 2 s temporal exclusion, and 76.32% with complete stage isolation. Three additional temporal-exclusion runs yielded 85.92 ± 1.38% Macro-F1. On a fixed S07 test set (26 scenes, 405 bulbs), replacing temporally neighboring training images with more distant same-stage images, while preserving training-scene and class-specific instance counts, changed Macro-F1 from 99.76% to 74.12%. In a three-seed, four-fold leave-one-stage-out (LOSO) evaluation, stage-based group distributionally robust optimization (Stage-GroupDRO) achieved 75.57% Stage-macro Macro-F1 versus 74.11% for class-weighted empirical risk minimization (Weighted-ERM), but the paired 95% confidence interval included zero. The full pipeline achieved 72.82% pooled end-to-end Macro-F1 at 19.32 frames per second (FPS) during offline evaluation. These results demonstrate substantial sensitivity to data partitioning within one acquisition session; external generalization, quantitative soil-removal efficiency, and closed-loop control remain untested.

AgricultureVol. 16(21)
Nanjing Agricultural University (CN), Xinjiang Agricultural University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon