The Relationship Between Load-Capacity Index and Common Geriatric Syndromes

Introduction:The body mass index (BMI) does not accurately reflect changes in fat and muscle with age.The metabolic load-capacity framework identifies fat as "load" and muscle as "capacity"; this is measured by the load-capacity index (LCI), defined as the fat-massto-fat-free-mass ratio (FM/FFM).This study examined the relationship between LCI and health outcomes in older adults across obesity levels defined by BMI.Methods: This study included adults aged 65 years and older who visited the Geriatric Outpatient Clinic from January 2024 to April 2025.A total of 113 participants were divided into two groups based on the number of geriatric syndromes: low (0-2 syndromes; 55 participants) and high (3 or more syndromes; 58 participants).The study used statistical tests to compare the groups and to examine the association between LCI and the frailty index, the SARC-F score, and the total number of geriatric syndromes. Results:The high syndrome burden group demonstrated significantly worse physical performance, higher LCI, greater FM, lower lean body mass, poorer nutritional status, reduced functional independence, and higher rates of depression, polypharmacy, falls, urinary incontinence, and obesity compared with the low burden group, whereas age, sex, walking speed, and cognitive status did not differ between groups.In the obesity subgroup, objective performance measures and functional independence were comparable to those of the non-obese group, yet frailty, sarcopenia risk, syndrome burden, and LCI were significantly elevated, underscoring the limitations of BMI alone.LCI showed significant, moderate positive correlations with the frailty index, the SARC-F score, and the total number of geriatric syndromes.Conclusion: Elevated LCI values were significantly associated with increased frailty, higher SARC-F scores, and a greater prevalence of geriatric syndromes.This finding supports the use of FM/FFM as a practical, biologically meaningful adjunct to CGA for screening and risk stratification in older adults.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Istanbul Medical Journal
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4274/imj.galenos.2026.44969
Primary Topic
Nutrition and Health in Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship Between Load-Capacity Index and Common Geriatric Syndromes

Deniz Suna Erdinçler, Ümmügülsüm DURAK, Duygu Ozata, Alper Döventaş et al.
3 links
Istanbul Medical Journal
Nutrition and Health in Aging
article

The Relationship Between Load-Capacity Index and Common Geriatric Syndromes

Deniz Suna Erdinçler, Ümmügülsüm DURAK, Duygu Ozata, Alper Döventaş, Seyda Bilgin, Suna Avcı, Gokalp Kurthan Avlagi, Kübra Çıngar Alpay
article en

Abstract

Introduction:The body mass index (BMI) does not accurately reflect changes in fat and muscle with age.The metabolic load-capacity framework identifies fat as "load" and muscle as "capacity"; this is measured by the load-capacity index (LCI), defined as the fat-massto-fat-free-mass ratio (FM/FFM).This study examined the relationship between LCI and health outcomes in older adults across obesity levels defined by BMI.Methods: This study included adults aged 65 years and older who visited the Geriatric Outpatient Clinic from January 2024 to April 2025.A total of 113 participants were divided into two groups based on the number of geriatric syndromes: low (0-2 syndromes; 55 participants) and high (3 or more syndromes; 58 participants).The study used statistical tests to compare the groups and to examine the association between LCI and the frailty index, the SARC-F score, and the total number of geriatric syndromes. Results:The high syndrome burden group demonstrated significantly worse physical performance, higher LCI, greater FM, lower lean body mass, poorer nutritional status, reduced functional independence, and higher rates of depression, polypharmacy, falls, urinary incontinence, and obesity compared with the low burden group, whereas age, sex, walking speed, and cognitive status did not differ between groups.In the obesity subgroup, objective performance measures and functional independence were comparable to those of the non-obese group, yet frailty, sarcopenia risk, syndrome burden, and LCI were significantly elevated, underscoring the limitations of BMI alone.LCI showed significant, moderate positive correlations with the frailty index, the SARC-F score, and the total number of geriatric syndromes.Conclusion: Elevated LCI values were significantly associated with increased frailty, higher SARC-F scores, and a greater prevalence of geriatric syndromes.This finding supports the use of FM/FFM as a practical, biologically meaningful adjunct to CGA for screening and risk stratification in older adults.

Istanbul Medical Journal
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Nutrition and Health in Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon