Navigating the Global Order through Trade and Discourse

The European Union (EU) promotes the Global Gateway (EUGG) as a values-based model of infrastructure development, widely interpreted as an alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Both initiatives operate across overlapping geographies, particularly in Africa. This article explores how the EU narrates its identity through the EUGG in relation to China, and how that narrative reads against EU–China–Africa trade. Drawing on Strategic Narrative theory, the study combines a critical discourse analysis of the four documents launching the EUGG with EU and Chinese trade data for six African countries (2001–23), analysed through correlation and lagged regression. EUGG discourse names China only once, instead constructing the EU as a morally distinct partner through a dependency narrative and an undefined circle of ‘like-minded partners’. Trade data shows EU and Chinese trade moving in parallel rather than displacing one another. The EU narrates distinction while its trade patterns reflect co-presence with China. Acknowledging that co-presence could bring the EU’s narrative closer to its own stated values of transparency and partnership. EU Global Gateway in Africa; EU’s silence on China; strategic narratives theory; EU–China–Africa relations; EU policy discourse; EU–China trade in Africa

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Reinvention an International Journal of Undergraduate Research
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31273/reinvention.v19i2.1969
Primary Topic
Belt and Road Initiative
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Navigating the Global Order through Trade and Discourse

Sebastianas Uribe
3 links
Reinvention an International Journal of Undergraduate Research
Belt and Road Initiative
article

Navigating the Global Order through Trade and Discourse

Sebastianas Uribe
article en

Abstract

The European Union (EU) promotes the Global Gateway (EUGG) as a values-based model of infrastructure development, widely interpreted as an alternative to China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Both initiatives operate across overlapping geographies, particularly in Africa. This article explores how the EU narrates its identity through the EUGG in relation to China, and how that narrative reads against EU–China–Africa trade. Drawing on Strategic Narrative theory, the study combines a critical discourse analysis of the four documents launching the EUGG with EU and Chinese trade data for six African countries (2001–23), analysed through correlation and lagged regression. EUGG discourse names China only once, instead constructing the EU as a morally distinct partner through a dependency narrative and an undefined circle of ‘like-minded partners’. Trade data shows EU and Chinese trade moving in parallel rather than displacing one another. The EU narrates distinction while its trade patterns reflect co-presence with China. Acknowledging that co-presence could bring the EU’s narrative closer to its own stated values of transparency and partnership. EU Global Gateway in Africa; EU’s silence on China; strategic narratives theory; EU–China–Africa relations; EU policy discourse; EU–China trade in Africa

Reinvention an International Journal of Undergraduate ResearchVol. 19(2)
University of Chester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Belt and Road Initiative
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Navigating the Global Order through Trade and Discourse — Sebastianas Uribe · Reinvention an International Journal of Undergraduate Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS