Judicial Control over the Implementation of Court Decisions in Administrative Judicial Proceedings: a Comparative Analysis of the Practice of Ukraine and EU Countries

The relevance of the study is due to the need to explore the European experience of judicial control in administrative cases to improve domestic legislation following the 2024 reform. The purpose of the article is to conduct a comparative analysis of the institution of judicial control in Ukraine, Italy, and Greece and to identify directions for implementing European standards in law enforcement. The methodological basis comprises dialectical, formal-legal, comparative-legal, and case methods, enabling an analysis of the evolution of control during 2005–2026 and Supreme Court practice regarding decision execution by collegial bodies. The results reveal that in Italy and Greece, this institution is based on constitutional principles without a clear legislative definition. It is established that in Ukraine, Law No. 4094-IX significantly modernized judicial control, making it mandatory in social and pension disputes as a response to the ECHR pilot judgments "Yuriy Mykolayovych Ivanov v. Ukraine" and "Burmych v. Ukraine". Common systemic problems of non-execution of court decisions, particularly due to budget constraints, were identified in the studied states. Perspectives for further research involve monitoring the effectiveness of the updated provisions of the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine and adopting the experience of other EU countries.