Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of supercritical-transcritical CO2 cogeneration cycles with integrated ejector and vapor injection cooling

Cogeneration systems built with conventional supercritical CO 2 topping power cycles cannot achieve sufficiently low exhaust cooling temperatures. Therefore, in the present study, four novel cogeneration systems are developed using regenerative Supercritical-Transcritical (sCO 2 – tCO 2 ) as the toping power cycle. These supercritical transcritical cogeneration (STC) cycles have excellent heat recovery characteristics. Four distinct STCs with different bottoming cycles are Vapor Compression (STC-VCRS), flash tank (STC-FT), ejector enhanced (STC-EE) and ejector injection (STC-EI) refrigeration system for cooling. The STCs are compared against regenerative sCO 2 – tCO 2 cycle (RSTC) which outperforms recompression sCO 2 cycle in internal combustion engine (ICE) exhaust waste heat recovery (WHR) for reference. Parametric analysis is performed to evaluate the impact of pressure ratios, turbine inlet temperatures, evaporator inlet temperature and evaporator mass flow rate on cycle performance. Exergoeconomic performance of the STCs for a particular operational condition is also assessed. Single objective optimization using genetic algorithm (GA) disclosed STC-EE has the highest utilization factor (UF) of 34.91% followed closely by STC-EI. STC-EI also incurs the lowest unit cost, 7.41 $/GJ. Multi-objective optimization is performed using Non-Dominated Sorting Algorithm (NSGA-II) to find tradeoff between maximum UF and minimum unit cost. A lower minimum cost is found in all four of the STCs than the reference RSTC. STC-EE has 16.22% higher UF and STC-FT has 4.13% lower cost which is 7.128 $/GJ than the reference system at their optimum. STC-EI provides 15.49% improved UF at 2.3% reduced unit cost, 7.264 $/GJ, a high COP of 4.013 and 62.9% exergy. These findings reveal ejector vapor injection despite its complexity can provide greater output at lower cost in integrated systems. The study also proves STCs can be the economical choice for IC engine WHR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Reports
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2026.109846
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of supercritical-transcritical CO2 cogeneration cycles with integrated ejector and vapor injection cooling

M. Monjurul Ehsan, Yasin Khan, Nifat Mouddit Nizhum, Mohammad Adnan Sami Dinar
1 links
Energy Reports
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Multi-objective optimization and exergoeconomic analysis of supercritical-transcritical CO2 cogeneration cycles with integrated ejector and vapor injection cooling

M. Monjurul Ehsan, Yasin Khan, Nifat Mouddit Nizhum, Mohammad Adnan Sami Dinar
article en

Abstract

Cogeneration systems built with conventional supercritical CO 2 topping power cycles cannot achieve sufficiently low exhaust cooling temperatures. Therefore, in the present study, four novel cogeneration systems are developed using regenerative Supercritical-Transcritical (sCO 2 – tCO 2 ) as the toping power cycle. These supercritical transcritical cogeneration (STC) cycles have excellent heat recovery characteristics. Four distinct STCs with different bottoming cycles are Vapor Compression (STC-VCRS), flash tank (STC-FT), ejector enhanced (STC-EE) and ejector injection (STC-EI) refrigeration system for cooling. The STCs are compared against regenerative sCO 2 – tCO 2 cycle (RSTC) which outperforms recompression sCO 2 cycle in internal combustion engine (ICE) exhaust waste heat recovery (WHR) for reference. Parametric analysis is performed to evaluate the impact of pressure ratios, turbine inlet temperatures, evaporator inlet temperature and evaporator mass flow rate on cycle performance. Exergoeconomic performance of the STCs for a particular operational condition is also assessed. Single objective optimization using genetic algorithm (GA) disclosed STC-EE has the highest utilization factor (UF) of 34.91% followed closely by STC-EI. STC-EI also incurs the lowest unit cost, 7.41 $/GJ. Multi-objective optimization is performed using Non-Dominated Sorting Algorithm (NSGA-II) to find tradeoff between maximum UF and minimum unit cost. A lower minimum cost is found in all four of the STCs than the reference RSTC. STC-EE has 16.22% higher UF and STC-FT has 4.13% lower cost which is 7.128 $/GJ than the reference system at their optimum. STC-EI provides 15.49% improved UF at 2.3% reduced unit cost, 7.264 $/GJ, a high COP of 4.013 and 62.9% exergy. These findings reveal ejector vapor injection despite its complexity can provide greater output at lower cost in integrated systems. The study also proves STCs can be the economical choice for IC engine WHR.

Energy ReportsVol. 16
Islamic University of Technology (BD)
Affordable and clean energy, Climate action, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon