Incremental Prognostic Value of Regional Myocardial Flow Reserve Beyond Global Flow and Perfusion: REFINE PET

Background: The incremental prognostic value of regional myocardial flow reserve (MFR) assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) beyond global MFR remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of regional MFR in the international multicenter REFINE PET registry. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 35,391 patients from 13 sites in the international REFINE PET registry who underwent rubidium-82 (82Rb) and 13N-ammonia(13NH3) PET MPI. Abnormal MFR was defined as <2.0. Patients were classified into three groups: MFR-Group 1 (normal global and regional MFR; n=19,744), MFR-Group 2 (normal global MFR but abnormal regional MFR; n=3,184), and MFR-Group 3 (abnormal global and regional MFR; n=12,463). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, late revascularization (>90 days), and hospital admission for unstable angina. Results: During a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 2.9 years, 9,903 patients (28.0%) experienced MACE. Annualized MACE rates increased stepwise across MFR-Groups 1-3 (4.0%/year, 7.5%/year, and 11.8%/year, respectively; p<0.001). Abnormal regional MFR independently predicted MACE after adjustment for clinical risk factors, global MFR, and stress total perfusion deficit (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25—1.43). Adding regional MFR to a model including global MFR significantly improved model fit (χ^2 4,784 to 4,871; p<0.001), discrimination (AUC 0.710 to 0.729; p<0.001), and reclassification (NRI 41.9%). Among patients with normal perfusion and preserved global MFR, abnormal regional MFR identified higher risk (5.0%/year vs. 2.8%/year; p<0.001). Conclusions: Regional MFR provided incremental prognostic value beyond conventional PET MPI findings, including global MFR, and may refine risk stratification, particularly when global MFR is preserved.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.29.26366834
Primary Topic
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Incremental Prognostic Value of Regional Myocardial Flow Reserve Beyond Global Flow and Perfusion: REFINE PET

Isabel Carvajal-Juárez, Leandro N. Slipczuk, Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag, Mark H. Lemley et al.
1 links
medRxiv
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
preprint

Incremental Prognostic Value of Regional Myocardial Flow Reserve Beyond Global Flow and Perfusion: REFINE PET

Isabel Carvajal-Juárez, Leandro N. Slipczuk, Aakash Dhananjay Shanbhag, Mark H. Lemley, René R. Sevag Packard, Gloria J. Hong, Mouaz Husayn Al-Mallah, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, Robert J.H. Miller, Andrew Jeffrey Einstein, Heidi Gransar, Viet T. Le, Damini Dey, Ronny R. Buechel, Paul Kavanagh, Robert A. deKemp, Alan Rozanski, Hidesato Fujito, Attila Feher, Mark I. Travin, Wanda Acampa, Marcelo F. Di Carli, Stacey Knight, Piotr J. Slomka, Thomas L. Rosamond, Daniel S. Berman, Giselle Ramirez, Steve Mason, Erick Alexanderson, Joanna X Liang, Donghee Han
preprint en

Abstract

Background: The incremental prognostic value of regional myocardial flow reserve (MFR) assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) beyond global MFR remains unclear. We sought to evaluate the prognostic value of regional MFR in the international multicenter REFINE PET registry. Methods: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included 35,391 patients from 13 sites in the international REFINE PET registry who underwent rubidium-82 (82Rb) and 13N-ammonia(13NH3) PET MPI. Abnormal MFR was defined as <2.0. Patients were classified into three groups: MFR-Group 1 (normal global and regional MFR; n=19,744), MFR-Group 2 (normal global MFR but abnormal regional MFR; n=3,184), and MFR-Group 3 (abnormal global and regional MFR; n=12,463). Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) included all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, late revascularization (>90 days), and hospital admission for unstable angina. Results: During a mean follow-up of 4.0 ± 2.9 years, 9,903 patients (28.0%) experienced MACE. Annualized MACE rates increased stepwise across MFR-Groups 1-3 (4.0%/year, 7.5%/year, and 11.8%/year, respectively; p<0.001). Abnormal regional MFR independently predicted MACE after adjustment for clinical risk factors, global MFR, and stress total perfusion deficit (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.25—1.43). Adding regional MFR to a model including global MFR significantly improved model fit (χ^2 4,784 to 4,871; p<0.001), discrimination (AUC 0.710 to 0.729; p<0.001), and reclassification (NRI 41.9%). Among patients with normal perfusion and preserved global MFR, abnormal regional MFR identified higher risk (5.0%/year vs. 2.8%/year; p<0.001). Conclusions: Regional MFR provided incremental prognostic value beyond conventional PET MPI findings, including global MFR, and may refine risk stratification, particularly when global MFR is preserved.

medRxiv
Intermountain Healthcare (US), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Houston Methodist (US), Albert Einstein College of Medicine (US), Mayo Clinic (US), Montefiore Medical Center (US), NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Yale University (US), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Federico II University Hospital (IT), University of Kansas Medical Center (US), Instituto Nacional de Cardiología (MX), Ottawa Heart Institute (CA), Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta (CA), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering
Good health and well-being
Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
DOIOpen Access PDFOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon