Economic development, historical state authority embeddedness, and democracy

This study examines how historical state authority embeddedness conditions the relationship between economic development and democracy. Drawing on a country–year panel dataset covering 1960–2024, it analyzes within-country variation in economic development and democratic outcomes. The results show that economic development does not exert a uniform effect on democracy. In countries with high historical embeddedness, the democratizing effects of economic development become weaker, as newly generated economic and organizational resources are more likely to be incorporated into existing state-centered political structures. By contrast, in countries with low embeddedness, economic development is more likely to facilitate autonomous social organization and democratic expansion. These findings suggest that the political consequences of economic development are conditioned by historical state authority embeddedness that shapes how new resources are politically absorbed and organized. The study contributes to modernization theory by highlighting the historical and organizational conditions under which economic development translates into democratic change.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Science Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121261489732
Primary Topic
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic development, historical state authority embeddedness, and democracy

Jiali Shen
International Political Science Review
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
article

Economic development, historical state authority embeddedness, and democracy

Jiali Shen
article en

Abstract

This study examines how historical state authority embeddedness conditions the relationship between economic development and democracy. Drawing on a country–year panel dataset covering 1960–2024, it analyzes within-country variation in economic development and democratic outcomes. The results show that economic development does not exert a uniform effect on democracy. In countries with high historical embeddedness, the democratizing effects of economic development become weaker, as newly generated economic and organizational resources are more likely to be incorporated into existing state-centered political structures. By contrast, in countries with low embeddedness, economic development is more likely to facilitate autonomous social organization and democratic expansion. These findings suggest that the political consequences of economic development are conditioned by historical state authority embeddedness that shapes how new resources are politically absorbed and organized. The study contributes to modernization theory by highlighting the historical and organizational conditions under which economic development translates into democratic change.

International Political Science Review
Kobe University (JP)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Economic development, historical state authority embeddedness, and democracy — Jiali Shen · International Political Science Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS