Restructuring Graduate Education in Türkiye: Evaluating the Graduate Education Institute (LEE) Model in Global Perspective

Graduate education is a critical determinant of national innovative capacity, yet its governance models frequently struggle to balance administrative efficiency with academic autonomy. In Türkiye, despite significant horizontal massification in higher education, vertical academic specialization remains severely stunted. Recent macro-level data reveals a profound academic capacity crisis, characterized by unsustainable student-to-academic-staff ratios reaching up to 31:1, systemic diploma inflation, and historical fragmentation across discipline-specific institutes. To address these structural bottlenecks, the Graduate Education Institute (Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, LEE) model was introduced, centralizing graduate programs under a unified governance framework. This study employs a qualitative single-case study design to conduct a document-based evaluation of the implementation and institutional outcomes of the LEE model, utilizing longitudinal data (2013–2025), quality assurance metrics, and multi-stakeholder surveys from Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (BAİBU). Findings demonstrate that the LEE model successfully mitigates administrative bottlenecks through robust digital transformation—managing over 70,000 documents annually—and acts as a catalyst for internationalization, evidenced by a 42-fold increase in international graduates. The centralized structure effectively institutionalized the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, culminating in a 5-year national Full Accreditation. However, comparative analysis with global benchmarks uncovers persistent systemic risks, including the threat of rigid "digital bureaucracy," lack of structured industry-funded doctoral programs, and the absence of holistic career tracking mechanisms. Ultimately, this study concludes that while the LEE model modernizes the graduate ecosystem, its long-term sustainability requires evolving from a centralized administrative unit into a decentralized, financially autonomous, and participatory academic hub.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Higher Education Governance and Policy
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55993/hegp.1912314
Primary Topic
Higher Education Governance and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Restructuring Graduate Education in Türkiye: Evaluating the Graduate Education Institute (LEE) Model in Global Perspective

Cihangir Kirazlı, Çiler Gülen, İbrahim Kürtül, Hüseyin Yakar
2 links
Higher Education Governance and Policy
Higher Education Governance and Development
article

Restructuring Graduate Education in Türkiye: Evaluating the Graduate Education Institute (LEE) Model in Global Perspective

Cihangir Kirazlı, Çiler Gülen, İbrahim Kürtül, Hüseyin Yakar
article en

Abstract

Graduate education is a critical determinant of national innovative capacity, yet its governance models frequently struggle to balance administrative efficiency with academic autonomy. In Türkiye, despite significant horizontal massification in higher education, vertical academic specialization remains severely stunted. Recent macro-level data reveals a profound academic capacity crisis, characterized by unsustainable student-to-academic-staff ratios reaching up to 31:1, systemic diploma inflation, and historical fragmentation across discipline-specific institutes. To address these structural bottlenecks, the Graduate Education Institute (Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, LEE) model was introduced, centralizing graduate programs under a unified governance framework. This study employs a qualitative single-case study design to conduct a document-based evaluation of the implementation and institutional outcomes of the LEE model, utilizing longitudinal data (2013–2025), quality assurance metrics, and multi-stakeholder surveys from Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (BAİBU). Findings demonstrate that the LEE model successfully mitigates administrative bottlenecks through robust digital transformation—managing over 70,000 documents annually—and acts as a catalyst for internationalization, evidenced by a 42-fold increase in international graduates. The centralized structure effectively institutionalized the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, culminating in a 5-year national Full Accreditation. However, comparative analysis with global benchmarks uncovers persistent systemic risks, including the threat of rigid "digital bureaucracy," lack of structured industry-funded doctoral programs, and the absence of holistic career tracking mechanisms. Ultimately, this study concludes that while the LEE model modernizes the graduate ecosystem, its long-term sustainability requires evolving from a centralized administrative unit into a decentralized, financially autonomous, and participatory academic hub.

Higher Education Governance and PolicyVol. 7(1)
Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University (TR)
Division of Graduate Education
Quality education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Higher Education Governance and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon