‘Protective legislation’, vulnerability, and public law

In recent decades, the concept of ‘vulnerability’ has gained increasing prominence in public law. While much existing research has focused on judicial reliance on this idea, this short article charts how the concept has proliferated through its use in legislation to impose duties on and structure the work of public officials. Despite this growth, we find little official or parliamentary record explaining why such provisions are being adopted more frequently. Whatever the causes of this proliferation, the result is that the statutory use of ‘vulnerability’ now spans an increasingly wide array of governmental domains, particularly in frontline service delivery, but the interpretation and implementation of these ostensibly well-intentioned provisions are often far from straightforward. Drawing on Olsen’s concept of ‘protective legislation’, we call for deeper reflection on whether and how these legislative measures affect public experiences and outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09649069.2026.2750803
Primary Topic
Administrative Law and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Protective legislation’, vulnerability, and public law

Jed Meers, Elizabeth A. Cook, Ruth Weir, Joe Tomlinson et al.
Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
Administrative Law and Governance
article

‘Protective legislation’, vulnerability, and public law

Jed Meers, Elizabeth A. Cook, Ruth Weir, Joe Tomlinson, Angela Paul
article en

Abstract

In recent decades, the concept of ‘vulnerability’ has gained increasing prominence in public law. While much existing research has focused on judicial reliance on this idea, this short article charts how the concept has proliferated through its use in legislation to impose duties on and structure the work of public officials. Despite this growth, we find little official or parliamentary record explaining why such provisions are being adopted more frequently. Whatever the causes of this proliferation, the result is that the statutory use of ‘vulnerability’ now spans an increasingly wide array of governmental domains, particularly in frontline service delivery, but the interpretation and implementation of these ostensibly well-intentioned provisions are often far from straightforward. Drawing on Olsen’s concept of ‘protective legislation’, we call for deeper reflection on whether and how these legislative measures affect public experiences and outcomes.

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law
City, University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), Northumbria University (GB), University of York (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Administrative Law and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon