How much faster is Wolff than Metropolis at the critical point?

I simulated the two-dimensional Ising model at its exact critical temperature with two Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, the single-spin Metropolis algorithm and the Wolff cluster algorithm, on periodic L×L lattices from L = 8 to L = 64. For each method I measured the integrated autocorrelation time of the energy and of the absolute magnetization, using four independent runs per lattice size. Both methods reproduce the exact finite-lattice energy within statistical error. For Metropolis, the autocorrelation time of |M| grows as L^z with z = 2.11(3) for L ≥ 16 and 2.16(5) for L ≥ 24, in line with the accepted value z ≈ 2.17 for local dynamics. For Wolff, measured in sweep-equivalent units, I get z = 0.29(1) from the energy and 0.15(1) from |M| for L ≥ 24, within the range of published values. In CPU time per statistically independent sample of |M|, Wolff was 5 times faster at L = 8 and 275 times faster at L = 64, and the gap grows roughly as L^2. All code and raw results are available, and the full study runs in under an hour on two CPU cores.