Paris in Strasbourg? The Role of International Environmental Law in the European Court of Human Rights’ Climate Change Jurisprudence

Abstract This article analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR or the Court) approach to international environmental instruments in its first climate change cases, specifically in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland . It focuses on the ECtHR’s use of systemic integration and its living instrument doctrine to incorporate international environmental instruments, including the Paris Agreement, Aarhus Convention, and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, into its interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). While respecting states’ discretion, the ECtHR links standing before the Court with Aarhus Convention criteria, and climate change mitigation obligations to ECHR rights, incorporating the Paris Agreements’ general goals like temperature limitation and greenhouse gas neutrality. However, the Court stops short of directly enforcing equity principles embedded in international environmental law. This article argues that the ECtHR’s balanced approach strengthens ECHR protections against climate harm, without overstepping its mandate into the domain of a quasi-environmental court.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/26663236-bja10169
Primary Topic
Environmental law and policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paris in Strasbourg? The Role of International Environmental Law in the European Court of Human Rights’ Climate Change Jurisprudence

Linnéa Nordlander
2 links
The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Environmental law and policy
article

Paris in Strasbourg? The Role of International Environmental Law in the European Court of Human Rights’ Climate Change Jurisprudence

Linnéa Nordlander
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article analyses the European Court of Human Rights’ (ECtHR or the Court) approach to international environmental instruments in its first climate change cases, specifically in Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and Others v Switzerland . It focuses on the ECtHR’s use of systemic integration and its living instrument doctrine to incorporate international environmental instruments, including the Paris Agreement, Aarhus Convention, and United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, into its interpretation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). While respecting states’ discretion, the ECtHR links standing before the Court with Aarhus Convention criteria, and climate change mitigation obligations to ECHR rights, incorporating the Paris Agreements’ general goals like temperature limitation and greenhouse gas neutrality. However, the Court stops short of directly enforcing equity principles embedded in international environmental law. This article argues that the ECtHR’s balanced approach strengthens ECHR protections against climate harm, without overstepping its mandate into the domain of a quasi-environmental court.

The European Convention on Human Rights Law Review
Lund University (SE)
Climate action, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental law and policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon