Biopsy–Resection Concordance of CLDN18.2 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Biomarker Interpretation in the Era of Targeted Therapy

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is an emerging therapeutic biomarker in gastric adenocarcinoma. This study evaluated the concordance of CLDN18.2 expression between pretreatment biopsies and corresponding resection specimens and explored its associations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. This retrospective single-center study included 71 patients, 58 of whom received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CLDN18.2 positivity was defined as moderate-to-strong (2+/3+) membranous staining in ≥75% of tumor cells. Concordance was assessed using Cohen’s kappa, positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). CLDN18.2 positivity was identified in 26.8% of biopsies and 21.1% of resection specimens. Categorical status was concordant in 65 of 71 patients (91.5%; κ = 0.769; p < 0.001), with a PPA of 73.7% and an NPA of 98.1%. Continuous analysis showed a high ICC (0.817; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.722–0.881; p < 0.001). Six patients had discordant categorical results, all of whom had received neoadjuvant therapy. Exploratory survival analyses did not identify a statistically significant association between pretreatment biopsy CLDN18.2 status and overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, the limited sample size and statistical precision preclude definitive conclusions regarding its prognostic significance. Overall, CLDN18.2 showed substantial biopsy–resection concordance, although positive agreement was lower than negative agreement. Discordant findings should be interpreted cautiously because treatment-related effects cannot be distinguished from spatial heterogeneity and sampling variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb48111134
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biopsy–Resection Concordance of CLDN18.2 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Biomarker Interpretation in the Era of Targeted Therapy

Yusuf Kemal Arslan, Cem Kaan Parsak, Kıvılcım Eren Erdoğan, Tuğba Toyran et al.
5 links
Current Issues in Molecular Biology
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Biopsy–Resection Concordance of CLDN18.2 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Implications for Biomarker Interpretation in the Era of Targeted Therapy

Yusuf Kemal Arslan, Cem Kaan Parsak, Kıvılcım Eren Erdoğan, Tuğba Toyran, Tolga Köşeci, Uğur Topal, Arbil Açıkalın
article en

Abstract

Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is an emerging therapeutic biomarker in gastric adenocarcinoma. This study evaluated the concordance of CLDN18.2 expression between pretreatment biopsies and corresponding resection specimens and explored its associations with clinicopathological features and survival outcomes. This retrospective single-center study included 71 patients, 58 of whom received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CLDN18.2 positivity was defined as moderate-to-strong (2+/3+) membranous staining in ≥75% of tumor cells. Concordance was assessed using Cohen’s kappa, positive percent agreement (PPA), negative percent agreement (NPA), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). CLDN18.2 positivity was identified in 26.8% of biopsies and 21.1% of resection specimens. Categorical status was concordant in 65 of 71 patients (91.5%; κ = 0.769; p < 0.001), with a PPA of 73.7% and an NPA of 98.1%. Continuous analysis showed a high ICC (0.817; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.722–0.881; p < 0.001). Six patients had discordant categorical results, all of whom had received neoadjuvant therapy. Exploratory survival analyses did not identify a statistically significant association between pretreatment biopsy CLDN18.2 status and overall survival (OS) or recurrence-free survival (RFS); however, the limited sample size and statistical precision preclude definitive conclusions regarding its prognostic significance. Overall, CLDN18.2 showed substantial biopsy–resection concordance, although positive agreement was lower than negative agreement. Discordant findings should be interpreted cautiously because treatment-related effects cannot be distinguished from spatial heterogeneity and sampling variation.

Current Issues in Molecular BiologyVol. 48(11)
Cukurova University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon