Executive and language systems competitively shape predictive processing during reading

When we read, our brains constantly generate predictions about upcoming words, which is thought to make comprehension faster and more efficient. Yet it remains unclear whether this predictive mechanism relies on the same domain-general executive resources the brain uses for other demanding cognitive tasks, or operates largely independently within the language system. Here we tested this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in twenty-five healthy adults, who performed self-paced naturalistic reading, an n-back task, and a dual task of concurrent reading and n-back, allowing us to place competing demands on cognitive resources. In three sessions, we stimulated the left angular gyrus alone, the angular gyrus together with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a hub of executive control, or delivered sham stimulation, and used computational modeling of decision-making to isolate how each brain state altered the underlying cognitive processes. Combined stimulation of the angular gyrus and prefrontal cortex selectively weakened the reading-time costs of unexpected words, but only when reading competed with the working-memory task, revealing that linguistic prediction draws on executive resources specifically under cognitive load. Computational models showed that the relationship was bidirectional: Unpredictable words also disrupted concurrent working-memory decisions, slowing the accumulation of evidence and increasing response caution. Together, these findings show that predictive language processing is not a fixed, encapsulated function but is dynamically coupled to executive control when cognitive demands compete. Our results provide evidence that prediction during language comprehension is embedded within a broader, demand-sensitive cognitive architecture that flexibly coordinates linguistic and executive resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-10-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.10.23.761476
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Executive and language systems competitively shape predictive processing during reading

Ole Numssen, Gesa Hartwigsen, Anna‐Lisa Schuler, Niklas Kroner-Weigl et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
preprint

Executive and language systems competitively shape predictive processing during reading

Ole Numssen, Gesa Hartwigsen, Anna‐Lisa Schuler, Niklas Kroner-Weigl, Sandra Martin, Jonas Obleser, Merle Marie Schuckart
preprint en

Abstract

When we read, our brains constantly generate predictions about upcoming words, which is thought to make comprehension faster and more efficient. Yet it remains unclear whether this predictive mechanism relies on the same domain-general executive resources the brain uses for other demanding cognitive tasks, or operates largely independently within the language system. Here we tested this question using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in twenty-five healthy adults, who performed self-paced naturalistic reading, an n-back task, and a dual task of concurrent reading and n-back, allowing us to place competing demands on cognitive resources. In three sessions, we stimulated the left angular gyrus alone, the angular gyrus together with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, a hub of executive control, or delivered sham stimulation, and used computational modeling of decision-making to isolate how each brain state altered the underlying cognitive processes. Combined stimulation of the angular gyrus and prefrontal cortex selectively weakened the reading-time costs of unexpected words, but only when reading competed with the working-memory task, revealing that linguistic prediction draws on executive resources specifically under cognitive load. Computational models showed that the relationship was bidirectional: Unpredictable words also disrupted concurrent working-memory decisions, slowing the accumulation of evidence and increasing response caution. Together, these findings show that predictive language processing is not a fixed, encapsulated function but is dynamically coupled to executive control when cognitive demands compete. Our results provide evidence that prediction during language comprehension is embedded within a broader, demand-sensitive cognitive architecture that flexibly coordinates linguistic and executive resources.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences (DE), University of Göttingen (DE), University of Lübeck (DE)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon