International Legal Frameworks for Protecting Minors on Social Media

Millions of children face daily risks while using social media platforms worldwide. International legal frameworks often fail to address these evolving digital threats consistently. This research examines how such frameworks protect minors across different jurisdictions today. It aims to identify gaps between children’s rights instruments and platform-specific regulation. The study uses qualitative doctrinal analysis alongside document analysis of legal texts. Scholarly literature and official legal sources were examined systematically for relevant patterns. Results reveal fragmented age verification, inconsistent enforcement, and limited cross-border regulatory cooperation. Algorithmic targeting remains largely unregulated despite documented risks to adolescent wellbeing. Rights instruments rarely translate into specific, enforceable platform obligations across regions. The study recommends binding international standards linking rights language to platform accountability. Coordinated enforcement mechanisms and shared verification technology could strengthen protection. These findings show why fragmented legal approaches cannot protect children online adequately. Stronger international cooperation remains essential for meaningful digital child protection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Law and Policy
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59022/ijlp.650
Primary Topic
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Legal Frameworks for Protecting Minors on Social Media

Tiberio Graziani, Azim Numberdar
1 links
International Journal of Law and Policy
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
article

International Legal Frameworks for Protecting Minors on Social Media

Tiberio Graziani, Azim Numberdar
article en

Abstract

Millions of children face daily risks while using social media platforms worldwide. International legal frameworks often fail to address these evolving digital threats consistently. This research examines how such frameworks protect minors across different jurisdictions today. It aims to identify gaps between children’s rights instruments and platform-specific regulation. The study uses qualitative doctrinal analysis alongside document analysis of legal texts. Scholarly literature and official legal sources were examined systematically for relevant patterns. Results reveal fragmented age verification, inconsistent enforcement, and limited cross-border regulatory cooperation. Algorithmic targeting remains largely unregulated despite documented risks to adolescent wellbeing. Rights instruments rarely translate into specific, enforceable platform obligations across regions. The study recommends binding international standards linking rights language to platform accountability. Coordinated enforcement mechanisms and shared verification technology could strengthen protection. These findings show why fragmented legal approaches cannot protect children online adequately. Stronger international cooperation remains essential for meaningful digital child protection.

International Journal of Law and PolicyVol. 4(10)
University of the Punjab (PK)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
International Legal Frameworks for Protecting Minors on Social Media — Tiberio Graziani, Azim Numberdar · International Journal of Law and Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS